එක එක වැල් බයිල නැති ඉතාමත් හොඳ පැහැදිලි කිරීමක්. විපක්ෂෙටම තඩි බබා පොර ටෝක්ස් දෙන වාහේලට ආදර්ශයක්. මූ ඇමති කරලා, අරූ ගෙදර යැව්වනම් තවත් වටිනවා.. 
එක එක වැල් බයිල නැති ඉතාමත් හොඳ පැහැදිලි කිරීමක්. විපක්ෂෙටම තඩි බබා පොර ටෝක්ස් දෙන වාහේලට ආදර්ශයක්. මූ ඇමති කරලා, අරූ ගෙදර යැව්වනම් තවත් වටිනවා..
According to some reports, an individual was actively involved in efforts to destabilize the country in 2022. That person may also be aware of certain sensitive matters that could potentially impact AKD’s reputation.Why AKD is defending a minister who is indicted for fraud by AG for his previous conduct.
කෙහෙළිය Vs ජයකොඩිFirst time heard back dated accreditation, we usually have annual audits prior expiration of certified period for renewal.
One thing is already clear: according to the Auditor General’s report, there has been a loss of billions. The President himself has also acknowledged that poor quality coal affected power generation and created additional costs. So even if this is ultimately not proven to be fraud or a crime, at the very least it is a serious failure, negligence, or mistake. And for that, the minister bears responsibility.
A minister does not have to be a criminal to be unfit for office. If such a massive loss happened under his watch, and he could not prevent it, detect it in time, or respond with proper accountability, that itself raises a basic question about his ability to do the job.
So what is the point of keeping him in the position? If he is not responsible, then the post itself has no meaning. If he is responsible, then he should step aside.