සැහැල්ලු දුම්රිය ව්‍යාපෘතිය(LRT) නතර කල නිසා ජපන් සමාගමට ගෙවිය යුතු වන්දිය රු. මිලියන 5,896 – විගණකාධිපති

1sam

Well-known member
  • Mar 25, 2016
    1,084
    1,253
    113
    This was recommended by Viyathmaga scholar col Uni Arts Fac Prof Gunaruwan . According to him this trail LRT journey from Maradana to homagama will give only 30 minute advantage over the use of highly congest road network from Homagama to Maradana via High Level?
    First with all due respect to prof . this is wrong and you do not need any formal education to understand the traffic congestion on High Level Rd and all other roads that leads to Maradana.
    Next there is a feasibility study of the project. If you read that properly the time save is more than 2 hours.
    So where did prof went wrong-
    answer- he had not read the feasibility study properly . There was a 30 minute time save stated in feasibility study if the bends on the track are straitened by acquiring land . This option was rejected as it will give on30 minute time save and cost of acquisition of new land etc .
    So , we can see the damage done by so called experts from Viyathmaga
    I think Prof. Gunaruwan being used as a scapegoat to not to go ahead with this project. Any fair minded person should know the benefits of this project. The explanations given by Prof. was baseless, far from the truth, and misleading. Furthermore, he deliberately avoid talking about the benefits of this project. Any bad project must have some benefits, but according to Prof. there are none in this project.

    In that meeting with the president, none of the other highly qualified, intelligent participants argue with Prof. Gunaruwan, because they know this meeting is called to "terminate this project", not to discuss the benefits and disadvantages.

    Prof. Gunaruwan must have been advised earlier what to say, and what's not to say in that meeting. When you watch the video of that meeting, you can see the president's reactions and replies which reminds us an utter fool. Whatever baseless points presented on the meeting, president praise him without any counterargument, and agreed with him wholeheartedly.

    Now, the Govt. can argue that, this project being terminated due to advice from highly qualified experts, not by president.
     

    Don GasCan

    Well-known member
  • Nov 3, 2010
    6,862
    5,606
    113
    සේදවත්ත
    ලංකාව දියුනු වෙයි කියල හිතන උන් හා හා රියැක්ශන් එකක් දාපන් මේකට වහාම
     

    dj_risi

    Active member
  • Oct 31, 2006
    317
    102
    43
    Colombo
    This was recommended by Viyathmaga scholar col Uni Arts Fac Prof Gunaruwan . According to him this trail LRT journey from Maradana to homagama will give only 30 minute advantage over the use of highly congest road network from Homagama to Maradana via High Level?
    First with all due respect to prof . this is wrong and you do not need any formal education to understand the traffic congestion on High Level Rd and all other roads that leads to Maradana.
    Next there is a feasibility study of the project. If you read that properly the time save is more than 2 hours.
    So where did prof went wrong-
    answer- he had not read the feasibility study properly . There was a 30 minute time save stated in feasibility study if the bends on the track are straitened by acquiring land . This option was rejected as it will give on30 minute time save and cost of acquisition of new land etc .
    So , we can see the damage done by so called experts from Viyathmaga
    යන්නෙ කොහෙද මල්ලෙ පොල්
     

    amilapradeep100

    Well-known member
  • Sep 2, 2010
    2,459
    984
    113
    අනන්තයේ
    I think Prof. Gunaruwan being used as a scapegoat to not to go ahead with this project. Any fair minded person should know the benefits of this project. The explanations given by Prof. was baseless, far from the truth, and misleading. Furthermore, he deliberately avoid talking about the benefits of this project. Any bad project must have some benefits, but according to Prof. there are none in this project.

    In that meeting with the president, none of the other highly qualified, intelligent participants argue with Prof. Gunaruwan, because they know this meeting is called to "terminate this project", not to discuss the benefits and disadvantages.

    Prof. Gunaruwan must have been advised earlier what to say, and what's not to say in that meeting. When you watch the video of that meeting, you can see the president's reactions and replies which reminds us an utter fool. Whatever baseless points presented on the meeting, president praise him without any counterargument, and agreed with him wholeheartedly.

    Now, the Govt. can argue that, this project being terminated due to advice from highly qualified experts, not by president.
    කාලකන්නි මුන් නම් ..