

athmaarthakaamee widiyata minissu hithana hati wenas kale nathnam kochchara katha kalath wadak wenne naa
anik aya hadanna kalin apita hadenna puluwan nam.....honda widiyata hithanna puluwan nam ....kawadahari lankaawath meeta wada hugaak honda ratak wei

Alaya said:kathawa atta machan
dan inne wedi hariyak kalu suddo
dan wediya one naha, me thread ekata waten reply gaana balamu
methana wena mokak hari aathal thread ekak dammanam replies 3,000-4,000 set wei neda ape kalu suddangen
But wat makes others think its offensive if use of words such as "themala" "thambiya" "marakkalaya" etc etc..i dont see any purpose in using such type of language...samee1987 said:yeah.....this is no offense for other nationalities.........he's blaming Sinhalese here for their weaknesses............

. isnt there better ways to educate public? i mean better use of language..just said:But wat makes others think its offensive if use of words such as "themala" "thambiya" "marakkalaya" etc etc..i dont see any purpose in using such type of language.... isnt there better ways to educate public? i mean better use of language..
we have a written history of more than 2500 years, sinhala was a well developed language even by 1800's.i dont think even in lowest levels they used this sorta language even 1920's...when anyone reads it what clearly can be seen is the expression of anger and a language use that supports it.CoolCartoon said:it was in 1926. it is bit harsh. but he may used those word those time it is not much bad or thats the way they used to talk.
