What I've to tell is that the credit for who won the war is irrelevant for both MR and SF.., Because both of them contributed so in that aspect both are equal.., and now what we have to consider is other aspects of MR's duration..
I have several questions those are pretty serious..,
1. did he obey the orders given by the Supreme court of the country????
no. instead he challenged it and brought a government official back into service.. we know who,
2. Has he promised to reduce the jumbo cabinet???? No, i've never heard him saying that, so who are going to pay their salaries in next 6years
3. Has he ever punished or removed a minister who did unlawful acts????no he will keep DR. Mervin as a minister for ever..,
4 Why cant he punish the people who cheated public money who were revealed by COPE report????
5. Why did he introduced politics into Army???
we all saw Shavendra and Prasanna talking, they wont talk unless for a higher order worst af all why did they forced the Head of state intelligence come into a public press breifing???? no country in the world hasn't done such a thing...
6. WHy do they say vote MR to pay our gratitude???the what about SF he met with a fatal bomb explosion and recovered and came to battle field and fought.., Shouldn't we pay gratitude to him also????
Why does they mislead the public like this
These reasons are enough for give my vote to SF
Please any MR supporter can answer
You are dead correct. The contribution made by all are equal. What everyone did was to the best of his ability. My mother did not go to the battlefield because she was too old and feeble to do it. But she did her part to the best of her ability. So, who made the bigger contribution is not relevant. Just forget about it.
There are other issues to be considered now.


