Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="D34DM4U5" data-source="post: 26236964" data-attributes="member: 570372">Not sure if Economynext didn't get the memo but if you've seen <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3fYqEdoTCk" target="_blank">the interview ceo of the glk had with the dg of trc</a>, he said something entirely different, in fact when he was asked about net neutrality, he clearly stated that some sort of fair usage policy has to be there to avoid abuse of available bandwidth and why content based addons are here to stay and allowing unlimited access to everything outright is not an option at the moment.What's troubling me is if you read the rest of <a href="https://economynext.com/sri-lanka-to-introduce-unlimited-internet-not-subject-to-fup-regulator-79936/" target="_blank">the article</a> where it says;I hope the so called "unlimited" plans will not just whitelist some platforms of their choice for the sake of being able to market them as unlimited plans that will be a big middle finger in the face of net neutrality and a terrible mistake that they will never be able to correct down the line. Also "SLT" not mentioned anywhere in that article, they're referring to TRC as "Sri Lanka's telecom regulator"</blockquote>

Top Bottom