Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ex-muslim Ahmed" data-source="post: 21964338" data-attributes="member: 179431">Hi Rajitha Wijayaratne,Thanks for the post.I consider my self to be a quite expert in Dhamma- i.e. that is the Dhamma discourses by lord Buddha, and sanctioned by Lord Buddha. Looking at  what you have written here it is obvious to me that you are the one who is utterly misled, delutional and to be quite frank, absurd.It is laughable to suggest Anicca is things do not fulfill desire. The PALI word Anicca's etymolgy does not in anyway suggest that it could be a derivation of two words. The pali text of buddhism has been verified and re verified by experts of the language Pali, and also by the experts of indo aryan languages not to mention the celebrated linguistics of the world. Therefore for someone to even hint that Anicca is UN-ichcha shows that he is really out of his league and depth. I am thankful to ewijesekara since he made some crushing points in his reply. He made it very clear ThatThe blessed one did not reject that there is happiness/ joy in lay life (or in panchakama)I think this is a very valid point since the blessed one talked about VIPALLASA in <a href="http://www.thripitakaya.org/tipitakaya/Index/457?s=10189" target="_blank">VIPALLASA Sutta</a>- The four Distortions/ Perversions in mind. One of these perversions is to take what is Dukka As Suka. (Man! My Tumour is in remission. I am Saved! Cancer is Gone!..etc etc..)<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/lol.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="LOL    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/lol.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="LOL    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" />I will continue to hammer your incorrect and comical views of dhamma but at my own pace. I sincerely wish you come to your senses and denounce these absurd ideas.</blockquote>

Verification: Hath warak paha keeyada? (hatha wadikireema paha)

Top Bottom