Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sanzilla jackcat" data-source="post: 9084489" data-attributes="member: 131221">machan youn can't use the RAM as a hard disk.There is something like this istrue.  There is a paging mechanism that is used in the x86 and x64 computers.So some part of the memory will be paged when they are not used recentlyby the operating system automatically. we say this page file in windows andswapping in linux world.This is to increase the performance.It's a good thing. And that doesn't imply that you don't need High Speed hard disks as the same speed or likely equally to the RAM speeds. Currently there are harddisks on the markert which met that requirments. These hard disks are called SSD disks , Solid State Drives. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive</a> In SSD disks there are no moving parts, instead of moving electrons <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/P.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":P" title=":P    :P" data-shortname=":P" />or moving parts due to the terminal expansion. But the technology is too costy still now. I asked a 3 months ago 40GB costs around 35,000/- Rs , so can you spend 35,000/- for just 40GB ? hell nooooooooo ! technology is there if you have the money,the problem is the money. and integrating the CPU and GPU is  a good thing. But intel cards are lessfeatures, they are not experts in graphics chips. Even the ATI cards arebetter than that intel chips.I think intel have to integrate with Nvdia ,in theAMD fusion technology AMD is working closely with the ATI ,actually ATI isowned by AMD now. Typically when we talk about the graphics world , according to the book ofGPU gems book 1 , the performance does not really depend on the CPUand GPU communication barriars. There are very small data to communicatedor shared. like vertices ,display lists and textures... very small when comparing the speed of the modern computer bus. Actually most of performance factors depends on the last rendering stage , last stages of the graphics pipeline.so I don't think this be a better idea.  But intel uses the 32nm or 45nm technologies which are really cheap andcost effective.Nvdia chip technologies can't afford that 32nm technology due to their techinical constrains , so there will be low heat generation because they are 32nm transistors!  And when there are no intermediate chips for interfacing to the busses it will be again cheaper too. However if the GPU unit burns on a chip then whole the CPU have to be thrown away.</blockquote>

Verification: Asuwa dahayen wadi kalama keeyada?

Top Bottom