Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Premium Land with House for Sale
anil1961
Updated:
Friday at 10:15 AM
AWS Certified Solutions Architect-Associate + AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Aug 19, 2026
🚀 එක පැකේජ් එකයි - මාසෙටම Unlimited Internet! 🌐
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Aug 18, 2026
🎬 CapCut Pro 1 Month Access! LKR 600
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Aug 18, 2026
🚀 Google One AI PRO Plan (Gemini Pro Activation) – 18 Months Access! LKR 2200
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Aug 18, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
ආසියාවේ ආශ්චර්යය කිරීමට යෝජනා දෙන්න.
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silver bird" data-source="post: 8219060" data-attributes="member: 103552"><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong>No president finished the war. The army did. If a president can finish a war by himself what do we need an army for? Mahinda was compelled to declare war. After the success at mavil aru our people began to think we can surely win. That's why he kept up the war effort. You didn't answer my question, Do you think he would have declared war if the LTTE didn't close down mavil aru?</strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong>How many years have we been at war after General Kobbakaduwa? How many army commanders did we have? The difference with Fonseka is he did the war with modern military tactics. Not world war two tactics. He didn't name his operations according to his gana(astrology). He didn't look for "suba nakath" to start an operation. That's why won the war with a minimum amount of casualties.</strong><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong>Can you please elaborate on the great things the president assumably did. So shouting on a stage is equal to fighting in the front.</strong><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong>The only great things he did was to gain political benefits in the provincial council elections.</strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong>This system won't change overtime. Because including you many people doesn't won't it to change. Is it so hard to trust a man from your own class than a person that came to politics because their father's did. That's how the system works. The son comes along to take over once his father leaves the post. Do you really think men from political dynasties really care about the common man? Do you think they understand even a bit about what the normal sri lankan goes through to win his bread & butter?</strong><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong>These kind of politicians will not allow the system to change.</strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong>No I can't guarantee that he will solve everything. But why are you so afraid to give him a chance? Because he's a commoner? Maybe 2500 years of feudalism must have hardwired the brains of our people to follow the descendants of the so called nobles or "Walaw" class. </strong><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong>Can you tell me why mahinda is suitable for presidency? The laws and theories of politics hasn't changed much since the time of Aristotle and Pluto. For example the so called democracy was first adopted in Greece & it still lives. Surely it has changed much during the years. But the main idea is the same. You can't compare music & clothes to politics can you?</strong><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong>There are many incidents in the world where people came to power without any prior political experience and still made their rule a success. If you think I'm lying you can research it. You would say it won't apply to Fonseka. So I'm not going to take time to give examples to you.</strong><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong>Can you please tell me why mahinda is a good president? The only good thing he did was to let the war happen. That's all. He failed our country economically and in the international political arena. Can you deny these claims? Can you tell me if our people are living an easy life now days? Can you tell me that the price of living isn't going up? Can you tell me that freedom of speech isn't affected by his rule? </strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><strong></strong></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silver bird, post: 8219060, member: 103552"] [SIZE=2][B]No president finished the war. The army did. If a president can finish a war by himself what do we need an army for? Mahinda was compelled to declare war. After the success at mavil aru our people began to think we can surely win. That's why he kept up the war effort. You didn't answer my question, Do you think he would have declared war if the LTTE didn't close down mavil aru? How many years have we been at war after General Kobbakaduwa? How many army commanders did we have? The difference with Fonseka is he did the war with modern military tactics. Not world war two tactics. He didn't name his operations according to his gana(astrology). He didn't look for "suba nakath" to start an operation. That's why won the war with a minimum amount of casualties.[/B][B] Can you please elaborate on the great things the president assumably did. So shouting on a stage is equal to fighting in the front.[/B][B] The only great things he did was to gain political benefits in the provincial council elections. This system won't change overtime. Because including you many people doesn't won't it to change. Is it so hard to trust a man from your own class than a person that came to politics because their father's did. That's how the system works. The son comes along to take over once his father leaves the post. Do you really think men from political dynasties really care about the common man? Do you think they understand even a bit about what the normal sri lankan goes through to win his bread & butter?[/B][B] These kind of politicians will not allow the system to change. No I can't guarantee that he will solve everything. But why are you so afraid to give him a chance? Because he's a commoner? Maybe 2500 years of feudalism must have hardwired the brains of our people to follow the descendants of the so called nobles or "Walaw" class. [/B][B] Can you tell me why mahinda is suitable for presidency? The laws and theories of politics hasn't changed much since the time of Aristotle and Pluto. For example the so called democracy was first adopted in Greece & it still lives. Surely it has changed much during the years. But the main idea is the same. You can't compare music & clothes to politics can you?[/B][B] There are many incidents in the world where people came to power without any prior political experience and still made their rule a success. If you think I'm lying you can research it. You would say it won't apply to Fonseka. So I'm not going to take time to give examples to you.[/B][B] Can you please tell me why mahinda is a good president? The only good thing he did was to let the war happen. That's all. He failed our country economically and in the international political arena. Can you deny these claims? Can you tell me if our people are living an easy life now days? Can you tell me that the price of living isn't going up? Can you tell me that freedom of speech isn't affected by his rule? [/B][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Nawa warak dahaya keeyada? (Namaya wadi kireema dahaya)
Post reply
Top
Bottom