Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Insight" data-source="post: 14625547" data-attributes="member: 317364">Although I have quoted the essentials the link to the full article was given for anyone to visit for further clarifications. If the link is not there only you can make an accusation.Your  allegations with regard to the quoting cannot be considered as valid. Getting back to your question the answer is there in the article itself. Anyway, expansion resulting the origin of the universe takes place after shrinking to a central point. When the whole universe is shrinking and expanding the effect on earth is obvious. Just before the big bang the earth along with the universe were contracted to a single point. After the big bang also you can expect only a sea of neutrons, protons, electrons, anti-electrons (positrons), photons, and neutrinos. So for both instances the word ‘world’ or ‘universe’ doesn’t make a difference. There’s nothing to make an issue over that word for both occasions. I have taken the following parts to understand the scientific view on this. I have posted the full article of this before.  Since you have asked the same question again I will quote the relevant parts to make it clear. This shrinking and expanding process is very similar to the evolution and dissolution mentioned in Buddhist temporal cosmology. For this also I will take the Nasa article to explain this. This energy behind the burst of expansion called "inflation” is described by Lord Buddha as arising of the primordial wind<img src="http://www.elakiri.com/forum/images/icons/sq/1.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />. This wind blowing up the structures of worlds of the universe is almost the same as the flow of energy behind the expansion mentioned in the Nasa article<img src="http://www.elakiri.com/forum/images/icons/sq/1.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />. The Vivartakalpa relates to the origin of the universe after the big bang and the Saṃvartasthāyikalpa relates to the equilibrium mentioned in the Nasa article before the big bang. </blockquote>

Verification: Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)

Top Bottom