Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
AWS Certified Solutions Architect-Associate + AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Yesterday at 8:16 PM
🚀 එක පැකේජ් එකයි - මාසෙටම Unlimited Internet! 🌐
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Tuesday at 10:57 AM
🎬 CapCut Pro 1 Month Access! LKR 600
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Tuesday at 10:55 AM
🚀 Google One AI PRO Plan (Gemini Pro Activation) – 18 Months Access! LKR 2200
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Tuesday at 10:53 AM
Canva Pro Lifetime Own Mail Activation LKR 500
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Tuesday at 10:51 AM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Religious
කර්මය පිලිබද මගේ ගැටලු Karma Questions
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Y2K" data-source="post: 8503237" data-attributes="member: 35049"><p><strong> 6 Precepts of Tilopa</strong> -No Thought - No Reflection -No Analysis -No Cultivation -No Intention -Let it settle itself</p><p> </p><p></p><p>If we look at what Buddhism would answer to the question Who am I? We arrive at the theory of Atta or self or ego. Until recently people from the West believed Buddhism was a very nillhist religion because it believed that self and ego were illusory, that they had no substance. If you have read the sections on Jung and Carl Rogers you will notice that they both also believe we build up a self which is not really who we are. Carl Jung calls what we normally believe to be ourselves ego and Carl Rogers calls our perceived sense of ourselves, or at least part of ourselves "false self concept". It should be a bit easier to understand the Buddhist idea of self now we have got used to these ideas within our own culture.</p><p></p><p>True Self or True to Yourself</p><p></p><p>I spent a couple of years living in a Buddhist community. I can remember being told not to try and look for a "true self" because the only self I would find would be ego. Rather I should try to be "true to myself". When we try to have a "true self" the only thing we are going to find is a rigid fixed self, incapable of change, whereas as human's we have the potential to change for good or ill throughout our lives. It is as if, in the West, we have somehow got the idea of personality wrong, and given that this will have a direct result on how we treat people this is a serious mistake. In order to have a "rigid fixed self" the feeling side of ourselves, our heart, must not be operating. If we have a "rigid fixed self" we are not capable of change. We cannot grow</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Y2K, post: 8503237, member: 35049"] [B] 6 Precepts of Tilopa[/B] -No Thought - No Reflection -No Analysis -No Cultivation -No Intention -Let it settle itself If we look at what Buddhism would answer to the question Who am I? We arrive at the theory of Atta or self or ego. Until recently people from the West believed Buddhism was a very nillhist religion because it believed that self and ego were illusory, that they had no substance. If you have read the sections on Jung and Carl Rogers you will notice that they both also believe we build up a self which is not really who we are. Carl Jung calls what we normally believe to be ourselves ego and Carl Rogers calls our perceived sense of ourselves, or at least part of ourselves "false self concept". It should be a bit easier to understand the Buddhist idea of self now we have got used to these ideas within our own culture. True Self or True to Yourself I spent a couple of years living in a Buddhist community. I can remember being told not to try and look for a "true self" because the only self I would find would be ego. Rather I should try to be "true to myself". When we try to have a "true self" the only thing we are going to find is a rigid fixed self, incapable of change, whereas as human's we have the potential to change for good or ill throughout our lives. It is as if, in the West, we have somehow got the idea of personality wrong, and given that this will have a direct result on how we treat people this is a serious mistake. In order to have a "rigid fixed self" the feeling side of ourselves, our heart, must not be operating. If we have a "rigid fixed self" we are not capable of change. We cannot grow [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Asuwa dahayen wadi kalama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom