Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Premium Land with House for Sale
anil1961
Updated:
Friday at 10:15 AM
AWS Certified Solutions Architect-Associate + AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Aug 19, 2026
🚀 එක පැකේජ් එකයි - මාසෙටම Unlimited Internet! 🌐
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Aug 18, 2026
🎬 CapCut Pro 1 Month Access! LKR 600
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Aug 18, 2026
🚀 Google One AI PRO Plan (Gemini Pro Activation) – 18 Months Access! LKR 2200
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Aug 18, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
තනුජකට මම විවෘතව අභියෝග කරනවා....
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="amilabanuka" data-source="post: 24735093" data-attributes="member: 5836"><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Exactly. there is a sure way to prove what Naga saying is doable. check it with SC. Naga can bring the matter to the supreme court and check if "Doctrine of necessity" can be utilized to change the constitution under Sri Lankan law, and can the PE be used as an indicator for the public approval to initiate "Doctrine of necessity". that would finish up this argument.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">about why others not doing it (disproving it via SC), if someone is saying that something is doable, he should prove it. until proven it is just a hypothesis and people cannot vote based on hypothesis. I cannot comprehend why they are not doing that but going in circles on this base matter.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">there is a very large voter base who will not vote to Naga because of this matter. No point posting videos and speeches done by x,y,z people whereas the correct path is available.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="amilabanuka, post: 24735093, member: 5836"] [SIZE="3"]Exactly. there is a sure way to prove what Naga saying is doable. check it with SC. Naga can bring the matter to the supreme court and check if "Doctrine of necessity" can be utilized to change the constitution under Sri Lankan law, and can the PE be used as an indicator for the public approval to initiate "Doctrine of necessity". that would finish up this argument. about why others not doing it (disproving it via SC), if someone is saying that something is doable, he should prove it. until proven it is just a hypothesis and people cannot vote based on hypothesis. I cannot comprehend why they are not doing that but going in circles on this base matter. there is a very large voter base who will not vote to Naga because of this matter. No point posting videos and speeches done by x,y,z people whereas the correct path is available.[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hathara warak wissa keeyada? (Hathara wadi karanna 20)
Post reply
Top
Bottom