Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AnuradhaRa" data-source="post: 28485878" data-attributes="member: 325076">2. Charge Transfer SystemsUnlike ESEs, these systems promise to discourage the possible Lightning strikes rather than tring to attract it. Whereas ESEs produce an ionized air to create an artifical electrical field, CTSs try to dissolve such ionized area and transfer the possible Lightning strikes to a heavier electricity densed atmosphere.In this sytems reduction of electricity zones is the main goal. Creation of these systems claim that basic mathematical and physics formulas tell us this is the best way to prevent the heavy negative effects of a Lightning strikes.3. Dissipation ArrayingLike CTS, DA Systems also try to prevent Lightning strikes rather than anticipating them. Their core principle is creating a Lightning-free area upon the installed location by creating a negative electrical fields. As we examined in the Lightning strike formation, electrical charges in the clouds choose the lest resistant positive charged path to the ground. DA systems commit to dissolve the formation of this negative charged electrical fields and also Lightning strike discharge as well.<a href="https://www.orbitaltechs.com/blog-passive-active-lightning-protection.html" target="_blank">https://www.orbitaltechs.com/blog-passive-active-lightning-protection.html</a></blockquote>

Top Bottom