Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sj1773" data-source="post: 23697179" data-attributes="member: 171413">No one is a culprit until otherwise proven. Just because you don't possess the murder weapon, you are not free to walk away. You don't really need the murder weapon itself to prove the killer. There are so many biological evidences that could be used in the absence of the weapon. Even the presence of the murder weapon does not conclude the verdict. Theoretical scenarios are so different to real life scenarios. The presence or absence of alcohol smell is a point to be considered. True. But, that is not the ultimate answer. Even in Sri Lankan forensic procedures nowadays, it is a must to do a blood alcohol test specially in a case of a road traffic accident irrespective of the the person's usual alcohol habit( both the suspect and the victim). Supposing the victim is dead, the blood for alcohol should be taken at the time of the post mortem examination.</blockquote>

Top Bottom