Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Premium Land with House for Sale
anil1961
Updated:
Today at 10:15 AM
AWS Certified Solutions Architect-Associate + AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Wednesday at 8:16 PM
🚀 එක පැකේජ් එකයි - මාසෙටම Unlimited Internet! 🌐
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Tuesday at 10:57 AM
🎬 CapCut Pro 1 Month Access! LKR 600
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Tuesday at 10:55 AM
🚀 Google One AI PRO Plan (Gemini Pro Activation) – 18 Months Access! LKR 2200
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Tuesday at 10:53 AM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Education
පෘථිවියෙත්_කළු_කුහරයක්
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Starz DK" data-source="post: 8532483" data-attributes="member: 309789"><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: DarkRed">ඔයා කියන දේ හරි වෙන්න පුලුවන්.මම මේක සම්පාදනය කරන්න කරුණු ගත්තෙ වෙන Article එකක් කියවලා.ඒකෙ තිබ්බ කරුණුයි අන්තර්ජාලයේ අඩංගු දේවල් වලින් තමා මේක නිර්මාණය කළේ.</span></span></p><p><strong>Formation and evolution</strong></p><p></p><p> Considering the exotic nature of black holes, it may be natural to question if such bizarre objects could exist in nature or to suggest that they are merely pathological solutions to Einstein's equations. Einstein himself wrongly thought that black holes would not form, because he held that the angular momentum of collapsing particles would stabilize their motion at some radius.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#cite_note-58" target="_blank">[59]</a> This led the general relativity community to dismiss all results to the contrary for many years. However, a minority of relativists continued to contend that black holes were physical objects,<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#cite_note-59" target="_blank">[60]</a> and by the end of the 1960s, they had persuaded the majority of researchers in the field that there is no obstacle to forming an event horizon.</p><p> Once an event horizon forms, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose" target="_blank">Roger Penrose</a> proved that a singularity will form somewhere inside it.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#cite_note-penrose1965-20" target="_blank">[21]</a> Shortly afterwards, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking" target="_blank">Stephen Hawking</a> showed that many cosmological solutions describing the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang" target="_blank">Big Bang</a> have singularities without scalar fields or other exotic matter (see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose-Hawking_singularity_theorems" target="_blank">Penrose-Hawking singularity theorems</a>). The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_solution" target="_blank">Kerr solution</a>, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-hair_theorem" target="_blank">no-hair theorem</a> and the laws of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_thermodynamics" target="_blank">black hole thermodynamics</a> showed that the physical properties of black holes were simple and comprehensible, making them respectable subjects for research.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#cite_note-HawkingPenrose1970-60" target="_blank">[61]</a> The primary formation process for black holes is expected to be the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_collapse" target="_blank">gravitational collapse</a><span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="color: DarkRed"> <span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="color: black">of heavy objects such as stars</span></span></span></span>,<span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="color: DarkRed"> but there are also more exotic processes that can lead to the production of black holes.</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: DarkRed">මේකෙ කියන්නෙත් මේක තාරකාවන් මගින් පමණක්ම සිද්ධ වෙන දෙයක් නෙමෙයි කියලා.</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p>If all nuclear burning in a star greater than about 1.4 <a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/dict_qz.html#solar_mass" target="_blank">solar masses</a> were to stop, and the <a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/dict_qz.html#star" target="_blank">star</a> allowed to cool and solidify, the solidified material would not be strong enough to support its own weight, and it would collapse as the <a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/dict_ei.html#electron" target="_blank">electrons</a> were pushed into the protons to make neutrons. This <a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/dict_jp.html#neutron_star" target="_blank">neutron star</a> material is stronger, but the star would be only about 20 km in diameter. If you piled on more material, you would eventually get to the point where there is so much gravity that not even the neutrons could hold it up, and the star would collapse into a black hole. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: DarkRed">මේකෙත් කියන්නෙ න්යෂ්ටික පිපිරීමක් ගැන.තාරකාවක් මැරෙන්න කලින් ඒකෙ තුළ න්යෂ්ටික පිපිරිමක් සිදු වෙනවා.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: DarkRed">මේ Particle Accelerator එකෙන් ඒ තත්වයෙ පිපිරීමක් සිදු උනොත්</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: DarkRed">[තාරකාවකගේ න්යෂ්ටික පිපිරීමකට සමාන] Black Hole එකක් ඇති වීමේ අවදානමක් තියෙනවා.මොකද මෙතන ඒ හා සමාන අභ්යන්තරික න්යෂ්ටික පිපුරුමක් සිද්ධ වෙන නිසා.<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /></span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: DarkRed">මම දැම්මෙ මම හොයාගත්තු දෙයක් නෙමෙයි.වෙනත් Magazine එකක තිබ්බ Article එකක කරුණු යොදාගෙන.ඒවා 100%ක් හරි නොවෙන්න පුලුවන්.<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: DarkRed"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Starz DK, post: 8532483, member: 309789"] [SIZE=4][COLOR=DarkRed]ඔයා කියන දේ හරි වෙන්න පුලුවන්.මම මේක සම්පාදනය කරන්න කරුණු ගත්තෙ වෙන Article එකක් කියවලා.ඒකෙ තිබ්බ කරුණුයි අන්තර්ජාලයේ අඩංගු දේවල් වලින් තමා මේක නිර්මාණය කළේ.[/COLOR][/SIZE] [B]Formation and evolution[/B] Considering the exotic nature of black holes, it may be natural to question if such bizarre objects could exist in nature or to suggest that they are merely pathological solutions to Einstein's equations. Einstein himself wrongly thought that black holes would not form, because he held that the angular momentum of collapsing particles would stabilize their motion at some radius.[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#cite_note-58"][59][/URL] This led the general relativity community to dismiss all results to the contrary for many years. However, a minority of relativists continued to contend that black holes were physical objects,[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#cite_note-59"][60][/URL] and by the end of the 1960s, they had persuaded the majority of researchers in the field that there is no obstacle to forming an event horizon. Once an event horizon forms, [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose"]Roger Penrose[/URL] proved that a singularity will form somewhere inside it.[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#cite_note-penrose1965-20"][21][/URL] Shortly afterwards, [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking"]Stephen Hawking[/URL] showed that many cosmological solutions describing the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang"]Big Bang[/URL] have singularities without scalar fields or other exotic matter (see [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose-Hawking_singularity_theorems"]Penrose-Hawking singularity theorems[/URL]). The [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_solution"]Kerr solution[/URL], the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-hair_theorem"]no-hair theorem[/URL] and the laws of [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_thermodynamics"]black hole thermodynamics[/URL] showed that the physical properties of black holes were simple and comprehensible, making them respectable subjects for research.[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#cite_note-HawkingPenrose1970-60"][61][/URL] The primary formation process for black holes is expected to be the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_collapse"]gravitational collapse[/URL][SIZE=6][COLOR=DarkRed] [SIZE=2][COLOR=black]of heavy objects such as stars[/COLOR][/SIZE][/COLOR][/SIZE],[SIZE=6][COLOR=DarkRed] but there are also more exotic processes that can lead to the production of black holes.[/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=4][COLOR=DarkRed]මේකෙ කියන්නෙත් මේක තාරකාවන් මගින් පමණක්ම සිද්ධ වෙන දෙයක් නෙමෙයි කියලා.[/COLOR][/SIZE] If all nuclear burning in a star greater than about 1.4 [URL="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/dict_qz.html#solar_mass"]solar masses[/URL] were to stop, and the [URL="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/dict_qz.html#star"]star[/URL] allowed to cool and solidify, the solidified material would not be strong enough to support its own weight, and it would collapse as the [URL="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/dict_ei.html#electron"]electrons[/URL] were pushed into the protons to make neutrons. This [URL="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/dict_jp.html#neutron_star"]neutron star[/URL] material is stronger, but the star would be only about 20 km in diameter. If you piled on more material, you would eventually get to the point where there is so much gravity that not even the neutrons could hold it up, and the star would collapse into a black hole. [SIZE=4][COLOR=DarkRed]මේකෙත් කියන්නෙ න්යෂ්ටික පිපිරීමක් ගැන.තාරකාවක් මැරෙන්න කලින් ඒකෙ තුළ න්යෂ්ටික පිපිරිමක් සිදු වෙනවා.[/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=4][COLOR=DarkRed]මේ Particle Accelerator එකෙන් ඒ තත්වයෙ පිපිරීමක් සිදු උනොත්[/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=4][COLOR=DarkRed][තාරකාවකගේ න්යෂ්ටික පිපිරීමකට සමාන] Black Hole එකක් ඇති වීමේ අවදානමක් තියෙනවා.මොකද මෙතන ඒ හා සමාන අභ්යන්තරික න්යෂ්ටික පිපුරුමක් සිද්ධ වෙන නිසා.:D:D[/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=4][COLOR=DarkRed]මම දැම්මෙ මම හොයාගත්තු දෙයක් නෙමෙයි.වෙනත් Magazine එකක තිබ්බ Article එකක කරුණු යොදාගෙන.ඒවා 100%ක් හරි නොවෙන්න පුලුවන්.:D:D [/COLOR][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dawasata paya keeyak thibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom