Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nash_Node" data-source="post: 18586625" data-attributes="member: 91200">NO., I think you got it misunderstood mate.Take a look at this chart below... This is usually used in HR to assess and grade their employees.  Although it should be MUCH more complex... let's apply this to Mahinda and see where he would stand<img src="http://clarkmorgan.com/wp-content/uploads/Potential-and-Performance.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />I would say... he would be graded at a 3Aagree or not?why?simply he was a great performer... roads, bridges & buildings... but did he have good potential?   NO.. I would strongly reject it.He was into shows and pompous extravagant expenditure... extorting and robbing the country... loss potential of foreign partnership... poor financial choices. People should understand that there is a fine line between being a good at performing your job and being talented or having potential of continuity of same. Mahinda failed... utterly and hopelessly.</blockquote>

Top Bottom