Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="madurax86" data-source="post: 5888357" data-attributes="member: 1293">What you are trying to prove and the way you are going to prove them have serious weaknesses, its better to leave science as it is its logic and its proofs are based of what is witnessed or rather what is left to observe it seems correct but its not .. if you can understand some out of the shell of scientific proof. Proving 100% mathematically is correct but stats are not MATH! its just the most probable to happen if you drop others talking about one single thing that is witnessed more you'll be mislead and most scientists were! That's how most of the things in science are proved wrong(e.g. Newtonian Mechanics, its not totally wrong but amendments were made by Einstein)Same for all those; science is not in books its all around you but you cant observe it only with 5 ways of input ..! and even when those inputs don't even give correct data!</blockquote>

Top Bottom