Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="imhotep" data-source="post: 30054459" data-attributes="member: 562115">No need to argue further. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite24" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure    :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" /> Here's the final statement issued by the IPCC.The prize was awarded to the IPCC as an organization, and not to any individual associated with the IPCC.  Thus  it  is  incorrect  to  refer  to  any  IPCC  official, or scientist  who  worked  on  IPCC reports,  as  a Nobel laureate  or Nobel  Prize winner.  It would  be  correct  to  describe  a  scientist who was involved with AR4 or earlier IPCC reports in this way: "X" contributed to the reports of the IPCC, which was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007.The IPCC leadership agreed to present personalized certificates for contributing to the award of the Nobel Peace Prize for 2007 to the IPCC to scientists that had contributed substantially to the preparation  of  IPCC  reports.  Such  certificates,  which  feature  a  copy  of  the  Nobel  Peace  Prize diploma, were sent to coordinating lead authors, lead authors, review editors, Bureau members, staff of the technical support units and staff of the secretariat from the IPCC’s inception in 1988 until  the  award  of  the  prize  in  2007.The  IPCC  has  not  sent  such  certificates  to  contributing authors, expert reviewers and focal points.For more information contact: IPCC Press Office, Email: <a href="mailto:ipcc-media@wmo.int">ipcc-media@wmo.int</a></blockquote>

Verification: Haya warak paha keeyada? (haya wadi kireema paha)

Top Bottom