Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="maheshmat" data-source="post: 8118235" data-attributes="member: 158156">Read this also... By issuing a public apology, the Sri Lankan board merely belittled  the concept. At worst, Randiv’s no-ball was petty; at best, it was  naughty. But he broke no law; he didn’t even contravene the ICC code of  conduct as it is laid out. He can be accused of breaching the spirit of  the game, but the spirit of cricket is a fuzzy concept. Batsmen rarely  walk when they know they are out, fielders do their worst to cheat a  favorable decision out of the umpires; and wives and girlfriends are  sometimes brought into the equation to rile an opponent. If Sehwag was  owed an apology it was from the bowler.   The bowler apologised, the batsman accepted; where do the rest of us come in? From cricinfo..</blockquote>

Top Bottom