Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="handley" data-source="post: 30569936" data-attributes="member: 567805"> <ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Government Employee Paying Taxes<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Their salary comes from tax revenue, meaning they are indirectly funded by the taxpayers.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">They contribute to the economy through their taxes and spending.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">However, they do not generate new money into the economy; they circulate existing money.</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Foreign Income Earner (Tax-Free) Spending Locally<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">This person brings new foreign currency into the country.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Even if they don’t pay income tax, they contribute through indirect taxes (VAT, sales tax, etc.) when spending on goods and services.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Their spending increases demand, supports businesses, and creates jobs.</li> </ul></li> </ol><h3>Who Helps the Economy More?</h3> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The foreign income earner helps more because they bring new money into the system rather than just redistributing tax revenue.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Their spending boosts local businesses, increases employment, and contributes to economic growth.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Even though they don’t pay income tax, the government benefits from the multiplier effect of their spending.</li> </ul>Conclusion: If the goal is to grow the economy, attracting more foreign currency earners (like freelancers, remote workers, and exporters) is more beneficial than relying solely on government employees.</blockquote>

Verification: Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?

Top Bottom