Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Google Pixel 9 Pro
vgp
Updated:
Thursday at 5:57 PM
Ad icon
Jobreceive.com for sale
Blogerwiki
Updated:
Tuesday at 8:55 PM
Post Your Vehicle for Sale — FREE! - https://libro.lk
Kalu_Puth
Updated:
Tuesday at 7:38 PM
ඔයාගෙ Assignment හෝ Thesis එක හරියට හදාගමු
ErMurazor
Updated:
Sep 26, 2026
Ad icon
BlackWall V2ray servers
hu KANNA
Updated:
Sep 23, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Religious
ශුන්යතා දහම
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nuwan9999" data-source="post: 31525060" data-attributes="member: 587037"><p>The "shaking of logic" you are talking about here is also subjective and this is not irrelevant nonsense. Just because you can’t give a direct answer to my question (that was still not answered), doesn’t make it nonsense. Doesn’t the fact that you try to avoid and talk about other unnecessary things prove my previous point? I don’t have a framework, I have a simple question, that you are struggling to answer. And all of a sudden here we are back in religious talk. You guys can’t help it can you? <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😅" title="Grinning face with sweat :sweat_smile:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f605.png" data-shortname=":sweat_smile:" /></p><hr /><p></p><p>This is also a mental function රෝෂ් අයියෙ and what you are saying is simply incorrect, there is no right or wrong here, everything is subjective. No matter how much facts you put in, people still see what they want to see <<< This is fact. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤷♂️" title="Man shrugging :man_shrugging:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" /></p><p>And as I said time and time again this is not about you have an ego or not. My question is about the <strong><span style="font-size: 22px">process </span></strong>of making a perception in mind and thinking that “I think Rosh has a huge ego in Abhidhamma”. You said there is an issue with that process and I simply want to know what it is. Forget about I am right or wrong. </p><p></p><p>why aren’t any of you guys understand my question? <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/baffled.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":baffled:" title="Baffled :baffled:" data-shortname=":baffled:" /></p><p>------ <span style="font-size: 10px">Post added on [DATETIME="UT"]1784846145[/DATETIME]</span></p><hr /><p></p><p>I can see everyone agreeing to this point. But your take on this is wrong IMHO. This "<em>interpret the damma purely through personal experience</em>" should be other way around, the way to do this is "<em>personal experience should be interpret through dhamma</em>". For this, you need to know damma first, agree?</p><p>------ <span style="font-size: 10px">Post added on [DATETIME="UT"]1784847714[/DATETIME]</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nuwan9999, post: 31525060, member: 587037"] The "shaking of logic" you are talking about here is also subjective and this is not irrelevant nonsense. Just because you can’t give a direct answer to my question (that was still not answered), doesn’t make it nonsense. Doesn’t the fact that you try to avoid and talk about other unnecessary things prove my previous point? I don’t have a framework, I have a simple question, that you are struggling to answer. And all of a sudden here we are back in religious talk. You guys can’t help it can you? 😅 [HR][/HR] This is also a mental function රෝෂ් අයියෙ and what you are saying is simply incorrect, there is no right or wrong here, everything is subjective. No matter how much facts you put in, people still see what they want to see <<< This is fact. 🤷♂️ And as I said time and time again this is not about you have an ego or not. My question is about the [B][SIZE=6]process [/SIZE][/B]of making a perception in mind and thinking that “I think Rosh has a huge ego in Abhidhamma”. You said there is an issue with that process and I simply want to know what it is. Forget about I am right or wrong. why aren’t any of you guys understand my question? :baffled: ------ [SIZE=2]Post added on [DATETIME="UT"]1784846145[/DATETIME][/SIZE] [HR][/HR] I can see everyone agreeing to this point. But your take on this is wrong IMHO. This "[I]interpret the damma purely through personal experience[/I]" should be other way around, the way to do this is "[I]personal experience should be interpret through dhamma[/I]". For this, you need to know damma first, agree? ------ [SIZE=2]Post added on [DATETIME="UT"]1784847714[/DATETIME][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)
Post reply
Top
Bottom