Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="nuwan9999" data-source="post: 31533600" data-attributes="member: 587037">I think there is, but it’s not a thing, as I said, its is defined by its nature.Imagine a kind of nature that contains following 3 characteristics:<ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">All defined by cause and effect: A thing or object is an effect of some causes and those things can be causes for other things. Nothing is fixed, if a thing is observed, it is happening in the current moment as the causes getting matched together, furthermore the observer is also a cause. Meaning, there is no Rosh, its Roshing, there is no Nipun, its Nipuning, there is no Elakiri, its Elakiring… </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Things appear to fulfil a shortage: A thing will appear or begin to exist if there is a matching void to fill. Void happens due to an expectation, expectation happens due to a misunderstanding. This expectation and misunderstanding are recursive feeding cycle and continuously grow as experience evolve.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Nothing is unique: Nothing is separated, everything is one (including expectation and misunderstanding) but they appear as separated because of above.</li> </ol>Can you think of any level below this and anything that cannot be explained by these 3 characteristics?  If someone says Theory of Everything - this is it IMHO. This is very high level, imagine how far we can take this with different applications. Also covers anything physical and non-physical (භෞතිකය සහ අභෞතිකය) - there isn't such things but figurative speaking...CFYI: [USER=31353]@nipund[/USER] [USER=589556]@Blair Solari[/USER]Nice <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/happy.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Happy    :)" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification: Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?

Top Bottom