Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pessimist" data-source="post: 23781706" data-attributes="member: 566496">The Evolution of Physics by Albert Einstein and Leopold Infeldඒකෙ පෘථිවි කේන්ද්‍රවාදයයි සූර්යකේන්ද්‍රවාදයයි ගැන මෙහෙම කියනව.Can we formulate physical laws so that they are valid for all CS (=coordinate systems), not only those moving uniformly, but also those moving quite arbitrarily, relative to each other? If this can be done, our difficulties will be over. We shall then be able to apply the laws of nature to any CS. The struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of Ptolemy and Copernicus would then be quite meaningless. Either CS could be used with equal justification. The two sentences, 'the sun is at rest and the Earth moves', or 'the sun moves and the Earth is at rest', would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different CS. Could we build a real relativistic physics valid in all CS; a physics in which there would be no place for absolute, but only for relative, motion? This is indeed possible!"Despite giving more respectability to the geocentric view than Newtonian physics does, relativity is not geocentric. Rather, relativity states that the Sun, the Earth, the Moon, Jupiter, or any other point for that matter could be chosen as a center of the solar system with equal validity. For this reason Robert Sungenis, a modern geocentrist, spent much of Volume I of his book Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right critiquing and trying to unravel the Special and General theories of Relativity.දැන් මං දන්නෑ උඹ කියයිද කියල අයන්ස්ටයින්ට හරියට relativity බෑ කියල. එහෙම කිව්වත් පුදුම වෙන්නෙ නෑ. සූර්යකේන්ද්‍රවාදෙ පෘථිවි කේන්ද්‍රවාදෙට වඩා ඇත්තක් නෑ. දෙකම එකයි.විද්‍යාවෙ ප්‍රවාද නෑ කියන එකෙංම උඹේ විද්‍යාව ගැන තියෙන අවබෝධෙ පේනව. ඒක ගැන කලිං තඩි පෝස්ට් එකක් දාල විස්තර කලා ආයෙ විස්තර කරන්න යන්නෑ තේරුම් ගන්න උවමනාවක් තියෙනවනං ආයෙ කියවන්න. එකම දේ සැරිං සැරේ කියන්න බෑ.</blockquote>

Verification: Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)

Top Bottom