Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
Gampaha
Thenya Mishel
menuka2000
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:48 PM
Handmade Character Soft Toy Bluey Bingo
anil1961
Updated:
Aug 3, 2026
Colombo
Dahua POE Switch 8 Ports (DH-PFS3010-8ET-65)
hashaz2012
Updated:
Aug 3, 2026
Ad icon
Singapore V2Ray VPN for Tunneling
hu KANNA
Updated:
Jul 31, 2026
Dating Website & Online Chat Room
hotvideo
Updated:
Jul 30, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Education
ෆර්මාගේ අවසන් ගැටළුව
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="priyankaH" data-source="post: 21123091" data-attributes="member: 556772"><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: Black">It is really difficult to say what exactly was in his mind when he wrote that he had a proof for his claim.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: Black"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: Black">It took more than three hundred years to actually prove this so simple looking theorem. In these three hundred years, the problem was tried by several really smart minds, who,I would say were as smart as Fermat if not greater. They simply could not produce a proof. Also, over the years Mathematics grew and new techniques were introduced. Andrew Wiles, the mathematician who proved the theorem, worked for 8 odd years to produce the proof and used techniques such as elliptic curves and modular forms which simply did not exist back in Fermat’s time.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: Black"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: Black">Now, it is possible that Fermat had a different and simple of way of proving the theorem. But if it had been that simple, I’m sure the problem wouldn’t have been open for three centuries. Some one would have figured it out.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: Black"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: Black">That means, the solution was not so easy as Fermat had liked to believe.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: Black"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: Black">Personally i believe that he wasn’t bluffing. He thought he had a way of tackling it, worked the outline of the proof in his mind and thought that the problem was just another simple puzzle and wrote the legendary note on the margin of that book that kept mathematicians wondering what the proof was. And Fermat had this habit of not really giving extensive proofs to his theorems, which by the way were proven later by other mathematicians after his death. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="priyankaH, post: 21123091, member: 556772"] [SIZE="3"][color=Black]It is really difficult to say what exactly was in his mind when he wrote that he had a proof for his claim. It took more than three hundred years to actually prove this so simple looking theorem. In these three hundred years, the problem was tried by several really smart minds, who,I would say were as smart as Fermat if not greater. They simply could not produce a proof. Also, over the years Mathematics grew and new techniques were introduced. Andrew Wiles, the mathematician who proved the theorem, worked for 8 odd years to produce the proof and used techniques such as elliptic curves and modular forms which simply did not exist back in Fermat’s time. Now, it is possible that Fermat had a different and simple of way of proving the theorem. But if it had been that simple, I’m sure the problem wouldn’t have been open for three centuries. Some one would have figured it out. That means, the solution was not so easy as Fermat had liked to believe. Personally i believe that he wasn’t bluffing. He thought he had a way of tackling it, worked the outline of the proof in his mind and thought that the problem was just another simple puzzle and wrote the legendary note on the margin of that book that kept mathematicians wondering what the proof was. And Fermat had this habit of not really giving extensive proofs to his theorems, which by the way were proven later by other mathematicians after his death. [/color][/size] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hath warak paha keeyada? (hatha wadikireema paha)
Post reply
Top
Bottom