Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Henry L" data-source="post: 17016550" data-attributes="member: 260809">Uppercut: "I was not referring to 'umpire's call LBW'. I have seen many caught behind decisions staying with the 'On Field call' due to lack of evidence to over turn it,which was the case here..." I've seen it happen too, Uppercut. Wasn't trying to disparage you. But in this case, there was way too much doubt about whether he had hit it. That much doubt, and it has to go with the batsman even though it was a referral by the batsman and not the umpire going upstairs himself. It just seemed the logical option to give the batsman the benefit of the doubt.</blockquote>

Top Bottom