Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="giggee" data-source="post: 22010786" data-attributes="member: 75685">the problem starts with bringing  batsmen who are half wicket keepers. neither of them are professional at the job.when we brings those and perform  poorly we think  cause he is carrying the burden of keeping wickets . then what we do? we retain him with the team as a batsman taking him out of keeping wickets. now we have kusal mendis ,kusal perera ,chandimal and dickwella when all of them included in the team with likes of Dimuth and  tharanga we have no part timers.mathews very rarely bowls even then only if he is the captain if he is nt he wouldnt. why part timers needed in tests ?cause to break the rhythm , bring batsman into a weak focus zone and at last to fill the overs when bowlers are tired or when a player gets injured. we cant offered to go with  just 4 bowlers when we play this much  wicket keepers in the side  leaving just asela gune  as an option (although here we have danushka).. cause we have very much injury prone bowling line up.it doeznt matter with india either we go with 5 or 4 results will be pretty much the same<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/yes.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":yes:" title="Yes    :yes:" data-shortname=":yes:" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/yes.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":yes:" title="Yes    :yes:" data-shortname=":yes:" /> but  going forward this issue needs to be answered in a proper manner<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/yes.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":yes:" title="Yes    :yes:" data-shortname=":yes:" /></blockquote>

Verification: Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)

Top Bottom