Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AncientGlory" data-source="post: 9637730" data-attributes="member: 262433">I think you need to ask Christians whether they can answer this or not. But I can guarantee you that this will be answered somewhere. So it comes to the question can it be logically answered? Well yes, but the problem is who decides whether it is logical enough or not? For you all answers provided for errors in Bible are not logical enough. But that's your subjective view. For me answers provided for errors in quaran are not logical enough. That's my view. So we end up in the same place again. You say there are errors in bible. I say there are errors in quran. No one can decide whether they have been answered logically enough.So again, you have your opinion that says bible is corrupted. But you can't prove it.What I'm repeatedly trying to tell you is that, I'm not saying you should follow a revelation which even has a minor corruption. It is irrelevant. I'm just saying you can't say which parts are corrupted, so some parts in that revelation are true. Which gives the question maybe the part ExMuslimAhmed is providing is indeed true.No one has showed proof. People have only presented logic. And as a muslim you have a biased view so you think this is proof.Good.This is not relevant to the point I am trying to make. I do not care whether bible contradict or not. You should ask this from a Christian.Not really. Some of the answers offer reasonable logic. For an example the answer I posted for your first error. It looked ok. But like I mentioned, who decides whether it is logical enough or not? Once again there has never been any proof.I still did not get the chance to watch the full video. Will reply later.</blockquote>

Verification: Haya warak paha keeyada? (haya wadi kireema paha)

Top Bottom