Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Puffin Rock Characters Plush Toy Set
anil1961
Updated:
Saturday at 3:51 PM
Toyota Vitz scp10 For Sale
Lakmal Bandara
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:50 AM
Kandy
Welcome all my all new pet shop Bark.lk
dilumrane
Updated:
Nov 2, 2026
Windows RDP Only Rs.500 a month
Blogerwiki
Updated:
Nov 1, 2026
Ad icon
V2ray VPN for Tunneling
hu KANNA
Updated:
Oct 22, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Religious
A BEST ANSWER TO ATHEIST (INTRESTING CONVERSATION)
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mononoke" data-source="post: 5576326" data-attributes="member: 238323"><p>The point is that the algorithm had <strong>no explicit instruction to generate that shape</strong> or any shape for that matter. It simply ran some mindless code. The shape is something evolved out of the algorithm. We can also see this in the brain. The human brain becomes a jumbled mess after neuron firing sequences, but promptly reorganizes itself because a few governing <strong>PHYSCIAL </strong>principles. The main point here is we can see simple physical laws acting in such a way as to organize complex system with no agency involved, the instructions are there in the physical laws.</p><p></p><p>The analogy about the self organization of a computer is silly. Just because nature doesn't create computers doesn't mean complicated designs don't arise form simple natural laws. If you really want a computer that arose from natural selection the human brain is probably the best example.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mononoke, post: 5576326, member: 238323"] The point is that the algorithm had [B]no explicit instruction to generate that shape[/B] or any shape for that matter. It simply ran some mindless code. The shape is something evolved out of the algorithm. We can also see this in the brain. The human brain becomes a jumbled mess after neuron firing sequences, but promptly reorganizes itself because a few governing [B]PHYSCIAL [/B]principles. The main point here is we can see simple physical laws acting in such a way as to organize complex system with no agency involved, the instructions are there in the physical laws. The analogy about the self organization of a computer is silly. Just because nature doesn't create computers doesn't mean complicated designs don't arise form simple natural laws. If you really want a computer that arose from natural selection the human brain is probably the best example. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Haya warak paha keeyada? (haya wadi kireema paha)
Post reply
Top
Bottom