Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Puffin Rock Characters Plush Toy Set
anil1961
Updated:
Saturday at 3:51 PM
Toyota Vitz scp10 For Sale
Lakmal Bandara
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:50 AM
Kandy
Welcome all my all new pet shop Bark.lk
dilumrane
Updated:
Nov 2, 2026
Windows RDP Only Rs.500 a month
Blogerwiki
Updated:
Nov 1, 2026
Ad icon
V2ray VPN for Tunneling
hu KANNA
Updated:
Oct 22, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Religious
A BEST ANSWER TO ATHEIST (INTRESTING CONVERSATION)
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mononoke" data-source="post: 5581708" data-attributes="member: 238323"><p>I'm going to try to be trite. The bit about Darwinian forces not being constructive is firstly wrong and more criminally you have taken Sir D'Arcy Wentworth Thompsons' word out of context. Wentworth was a naturalist and a darwinist through and through. He proposed what is now called structuralism as a complementary force to natural selection. He even won the darwin medal. The reptiles not not evolving into birds argument is false. Because it is unequivocally accepted that bird evolved from raptors, incase you don't know what raptors are they are the things that tried to eat the kid in kitchen scene Jurassic park. They are dinosaurs, hence reptiles. Please don't say evolution doesn't occour at a macrocosmic level, thats an old story we have seen evolution in labs. </p><p></p><p>EDIT: this just came in <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8273938.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8273938.stm</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>I am not doing to answer your stupid who created the universe argument again. Because i've beaten it to death, and it's lying there next to you in a pool of viscera and blood.</p><p></p><p>As for the latter part of your entry, Islam was not the first piece of religous literature to claim that they successfully professed the big bang theory. Everybody from Plato in Timaeus to the Vedic scriptures have given some vague account of creation of the universe that some misguided people claim to be compatible with the Big Bang. The answer is no. There are alot of things that are out of place and a lot of details left out. It's just viscous bullshit. The Islamic version of the big bang is also a knock off of Plato's version.</p><p></p><p>I think we should drop this discussion here. I don't want to antagonize you and my vacation is over I have to go back to school. So I won't have alot of free time on my hands. I thank you for your participation, it has been interesting. No hard feelings mate, Choa!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mononoke, post: 5581708, member: 238323"] I'm going to try to be trite. The bit about Darwinian forces not being constructive is firstly wrong and more criminally you have taken Sir D'Arcy Wentworth Thompsons' word out of context. Wentworth was a naturalist and a darwinist through and through. He proposed what is now called structuralism as a complementary force to natural selection. He even won the darwin medal. The reptiles not not evolving into birds argument is false. Because it is unequivocally accepted that bird evolved from raptors, incase you don't know what raptors are they are the things that tried to eat the kid in kitchen scene Jurassic park. They are dinosaurs, hence reptiles. Please don't say evolution doesn't occour at a macrocosmic level, thats an old story we have seen evolution in labs. EDIT: this just came in [URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8273938.stm[/URL] I am not doing to answer your stupid who created the universe argument again. Because i've beaten it to death, and it's lying there next to you in a pool of viscera and blood. As for the latter part of your entry, Islam was not the first piece of religous literature to claim that they successfully professed the big bang theory. Everybody from Plato in Timaeus to the Vedic scriptures have given some vague account of creation of the universe that some misguided people claim to be compatible with the Big Bang. The answer is no. There are alot of things that are out of place and a lot of details left out. It's just viscous bullshit. The Islamic version of the big bang is also a knock off of Plato's version. I think we should drop this discussion here. I don't want to antagonize you and my vacation is over I have to go back to school. So I won't have alot of free time on my hands. I thank you for your participation, it has been interesting. No hard feelings mate, Choa! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Nawa warak dahaya keeyada? (Namaya wadi kireema dahaya)
Post reply
Top
Bottom