Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="upulcranga" data-source="post: 3749152" data-attributes="member: 58660">well......these discussion about results.....I myt b able to add up something here...!1st....A/L z a very competitive exam and thus d examz z quite tough n d marking will b tuf all d same....bt evn so...generally every marker is asked to correct fairly n to look in d child corner of view n try to undrstnd wot d child hs really meant to say.....n yeah...this is true bcz my mum z a physics teacher n she personally says n does so...2nd...since itz a competitive exam....certain answers may forced not to b accepted as a way of domination....so been sure about wot u wrote in d ppr is not really a enough parameter to predict ur results....n of course..MCQz r a seperate section...if u hv scored 45 in MCQ according to d Marking scheme...then u will certainly get 45....those contradictions tht were mentioned r really to b questiond...bt I dnt thnk itz such a gud idea to question d 2nd papers...itz probable tht smthng myt hv gotten wrong.......3rd....finally...nt as a comfort...bt d reality...d marking was certainly not done as satisfactory as it was done beforehand dis tym...it was evn worse thn our tym to tell u d truth....so dis acts of DOE n NETS are very irresponsible n neccessory steps shud b tkn to eradicate those terrible mistakes....aftr all...in countris like SL...A/L z future shaping examz...bcz if u dnt hv enuf money to hit for a forign degree...thn many ppl'z future is gud as dead......so governmnt shouldnt play wth students lives....!</blockquote>

Verification: Awruddata maasa keeyada?

Top Bottom