Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="buva" data-source="post: 2533694" data-attributes="member: 66788"><a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1493291.ece" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/qatarlambo_opt.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a>A wealthy Arab man, thought to be a Sheikh, recently had his black and gold Lamborghini LP640 flown 3,250 miles to London via Qatar Airways and trucked to a certified UK Lamborghini dealership last Friday for a fluid change, which cost him a paltry £3,552 compared to the £20,000 round-trip flight. That's a grand total of £23,552 ($46,644 USD) for a friggin' oil change. Environmentalists are obviously not pleased with the owner's wanton display of conspicuous consumption. Airport workers at Heathrow also blasted the owner's excess after watching the car get the royal treatment on the runway. One commented, "This car doesn't have a carbon footprint - more of a crater," and another pointed out that it would've been much cheaper to just fly certified Lamborghini technicians to Qatar to do the service. This type of behavior begs the question of how far one's personal choice extends in the face of the greater good. We're told the Earth is dying beneath our feet and it's all our fault, so should a Sheikh be allowed to ship his car around the world for an oil change while the rest of us stick compact flourescent light bulbs in our lamps and wait in line to buy a Prius? Perhaps the only act that could be more environmentally egregious than this is if he just threw out his exotic and bought a new one every 3,000 miles.</blockquote>

Verification: Hath warak paha keeyada? (hatha wadikireema paha)

Top Bottom