Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:10 AM
Ad icon
QA Engineer Intern
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:07 AM
Ad icon
Sell your Land, House on idamata.lk for FREE
sajith.xp.pk
Updated:
Thursday at 9:03 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys
anil1961
Updated:
Jun 23, 2026
Bodim.lk out now !
Manoj Suranga Bandara
Updated:
Jun 21, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
News
About the chanel 4 video
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ac2000" data-source="post: 5508979" data-attributes="member: 132852"><p><strong>Technical analyst exposes 'C- 4' gutter journalism</strong></p><p></p><p> <strong><em><span style="font-family: 'Webdings'">< </span>C-4 video created from a video camera, not from a mobile phone. </em></strong></p><p> <strong><em> <span style="font-family: 'Webdings'">< </span>Sound dubbed: a case study for gutter journalism. </em></strong></p><p> In video coding or broadcasting to create a final video for any occasion it is the practice to start with high quality video first while transcending with editing for a final product. <strong>Mpeg4</strong> is a compressed format. </p><p> </p><p><strong>If one considers the Channel- 4 video: </strong></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">●</span> It says it came from a <strong> mobile phone video</strong> source. <strong>There are only two formats in mobile video formats</strong>. One is an old 3GPP format and the other an advanced <strong>Mpeg4, H-264 part 10</strong> which is <strong>MP4</strong> format which is highly processor intensive encoding and due to this issue, mobile phones in the present markets does not produce high quality videos. Such processors are not that powerful to take good quality video that Channel- 4 claims since channel - 4 video is much high quality than existing <strong>Smart phones</strong> can create <strong>TODAY</strong>. </p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">● </span>Within H-264 coding we also have extra component called <strong>Motion Vectors (VMC)</strong> which are used to predict motion on temporal and spatial domain. The Channel - 4 video have quite high quality VMC(motion Vector) and this VMC came from <strong>a video camera and not from a mobile phone source</strong>. Also Mobile source also tend to be blocky in nature when it come to motion. </p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">●</span> Since original video is from<strong> AVI and QuickTime format, t</strong>he whole video scenario indicates that<strong> ORIGINAL video is of high quality </strong>that came from a <strong>video camera source since mobile formats does not use AVI or Quicktime which are high quality video formats</strong>. </p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">● </span>If they changed the mobile format to <strong>AVI or QT </strong>then the <strong>final video</strong> will be of poor quality. In the analysis it was <strong>found that the AVI and QT formats are of very high quality</strong>. </p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">● </span> Also it is quite explicit that the<strong> camcorder video was transferred to a computer for editing and sound was dubbed later and gun shots were not in synchronism with the video and normally audio is always way ahead of the video since video processing takes time and in this case the audio is very late INDICATING a very amateurish video and audio editing</strong>. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20090903_05" target="_blank">http://defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20090903_05</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ac2000, post: 5508979, member: 132852"] [B]Technical analyst exposes 'C- 4' gutter journalism[/B] [B][I][FONT=Webdings]< [/FONT]C-4 video created from a video camera, not from a mobile phone. [/I][/B] [B][I] [FONT=Webdings]< [/FONT]Sound dubbed: a case study for gutter journalism. [/I][/B] In video coding or broadcasting to create a final video for any occasion it is the practice to start with high quality video first while transcending with editing for a final product. [B]Mpeg4[/B] is a compressed format. [B]If one considers the Channel- 4 video: [/B] [SIZE=3]●[/SIZE] It says it came from a [B] mobile phone video[/B] source. [B]There are only two formats in mobile video formats[/B]. One is an old 3GPP format and the other an advanced [B]Mpeg4, H-264 part 10[/B] which is [B]MP4[/B] format which is highly processor intensive encoding and due to this issue, mobile phones in the present markets does not produce high quality videos. Such processors are not that powerful to take good quality video that Channel- 4 claims since channel - 4 video is much high quality than existing [B]Smart phones[/B] can create [B]TODAY[/B]. [SIZE=3] [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]● [/SIZE]Within H-264 coding we also have extra component called [B]Motion Vectors (VMC)[/B] which are used to predict motion on temporal and spatial domain. The Channel - 4 video have quite high quality VMC(motion Vector) and this VMC came from [B]a video camera and not from a mobile phone source[/B]. Also Mobile source also tend to be blocky in nature when it come to motion. [SIZE=3] [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]●[/SIZE] Since original video is from[B] AVI and QuickTime format, t[/B]he whole video scenario indicates that[B] ORIGINAL video is of high quality [/B]that came from a [B]video camera source since mobile formats does not use AVI or Quicktime which are high quality video formats[/B]. [SIZE=3] [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]● [/SIZE]If they changed the mobile format to [B]AVI or QT [/B]then the [B]final video[/B] will be of poor quality. In the analysis it was [B]found that the AVI and QT formats are of very high quality[/B]. [SIZE=3] [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]● [/SIZE] Also it is quite explicit that the[B] camcorder video was transferred to a computer for editing and sound was dubbed later and gun shots were not in synchronism with the video and normally audio is always way ahead of the video since video processing takes time and in this case the audio is very late INDICATING a very amateurish video and audio editing[/B]. [url]http://defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20090903_05[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)
Post reply
Top
Bottom