Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Wednesday at 11:58 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:23 PM
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Wednesday at 4:54 PM
Ad icon
🎮 INDIAN PSN GIFT CARDS AVAILABLE NOW! 🎮
madukaperera
Updated:
Tuesday at 12:57 PM
🚀 Google AI PRO – 18 Months | Rs. 850 Only
lkkolla
Updated:
Monday at 4:56 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Aethist corner of Elakiri
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="djHiran" data-source="post: 12316545" data-attributes="member: 6429"><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Sienna">But De Broglie-Bohm theory itself is non-local. If you try to marry this theory with relativity it leads to causal paradoxes. That may be why physicists do not prefer this theory much. However to say Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics makes it non-deterministic is absurd. You might be assuming that the state of a physical system is somehow intrinsic to the system but not so natural to the theory we are using to describe it. If you buy that it can easily be shown that even Newtonian physics is non-deterministic! Why? If the state of the system is not a property of the theory, one might ask the position and acceleration of a particle are such and such, using that find the position after 5 seconds. Is it possible in classical framework? No! The state of the system MUST be defined in accordance with how the theory requires it.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Sienna"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Sienna">In quantum mechanics, the natural way to describe the state of the system is to specify the state vector or the wave function. That is the intrinsic way of describing a system completely in quantum mechanics. If you try to use the state of a system as defined in Newtonian framework together with quantum mechanics, then you are doing it wrong. Surely is quantum mechanics non-deterministic if you use the "wrong" state.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Sienna"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Sienna">On the other hand, given the initial state vector of a particle as required by quantum mechanics, QM is capable of predicting the state vector of the particle at a later time uniquely! But yes, that state is not what you are used to think of as the state in classical framework.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Sienna"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Sienna">Quantum mechanics is NOT a non-deterministic theory if you admit this. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/happy.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Happy :)" data-shortname=":)" /></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="djHiran, post: 12316545, member: 6429"] [SIZE=4][COLOR=Sienna]But De Broglie-Bohm theory itself is non-local. If you try to marry this theory with relativity it leads to causal paradoxes. That may be why physicists do not prefer this theory much. However to say Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics makes it non-deterministic is absurd. You might be assuming that the state of a physical system is somehow intrinsic to the system but not so natural to the theory we are using to describe it. If you buy that it can easily be shown that even Newtonian physics is non-deterministic! Why? If the state of the system is not a property of the theory, one might ask the position and acceleration of a particle are such and such, using that find the position after 5 seconds. Is it possible in classical framework? No! The state of the system MUST be defined in accordance with how the theory requires it. In quantum mechanics, the natural way to describe the state of the system is to specify the state vector or the wave function. That is the intrinsic way of describing a system completely in quantum mechanics. If you try to use the state of a system as defined in Newtonian framework together with quantum mechanics, then you are doing it wrong. Surely is quantum mechanics non-deterministic if you use the "wrong" state. On the other hand, given the initial state vector of a particle as required by quantum mechanics, QM is capable of predicting the state vector of the particle at a later time uniquely! But yes, that state is not what you are used to think of as the state in classical framework. Quantum mechanics is NOT a non-deterministic theory if you admit this. :)[/COLOR][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom