Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Yesterday at 11:58 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Yesterday at 10:23 PM
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Yesterday at 4:54 PM
Ad icon
🎮 INDIAN PSN GIFT CARDS AVAILABLE NOW! 🎮
madukaperera
Updated:
Tuesday at 12:57 PM
🚀 Google AI PRO – 18 Months | Rs. 850 Only
lkkolla
Updated:
Monday at 4:56 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Aethist corner of Elakiri
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="djHiran" data-source="post: 12323972" data-attributes="member: 6429"><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px">Proving Nibbana scientifically is not ever going to happen my friend! Nibbana is a personal experience. Think of it this way: When you see red color you cannot be sure if that's what someone else is seeing. If what he see is green according to your personal experience, he will still say what he see is red, because thats what he know as read! You fail to use your scientific apparatus to prove/disprove the existence of a red green discrepancy because you fail to find any physical law violated by hypothesizing the existence or non-existance of that condition.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px">Even proving the existence of consciousness must be very hard if not impossible. You might say it is there because you experience it. But that won't "prove" it scientifically.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px">Choosing Christianity or Islam if you had to merely for a 1 million dollars can very well be justified <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/yes.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":yes:" title="Yes :yes:" data-shortname=":yes:" />, and I take it as an expression of a personal preference. Firstly "believing in" Buddhism as a religion is not going to do any good for you. Secondly, yes Buddhism preach about something closely related to "sadness". If you translate "dhukka" into sadness it is just like saying "gandha" is "bad smell". Dhukka really contain both sadness and happiness in its core.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px">However if you try to meditate in the intended way you will discover a great deal of pleasure out of it. You do not have to be or become a so called Buddhist to try out that. One of my Muslim friends once wanted to try "Jehana" and I told him how to. He expressed the same pleasure I experience after practicing it. Yet he is still a good Muslim. I admit that Jehana and other higher states of consciousness do not come to you for free as a consequence of adhering to Buddhism. That is but because it has absolutely nothing to do with your religion or religious beliefs! </span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px">No need to say you cannot prove the existence of Jehana by scientific means, but only you can observe are the consequences of it. For example, a considerable shift in electric fields sourcing from brain is said to be observed. See for example : <a href="http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/EEGmeditation.htm" target="_blank">http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/EEGmeditation.htm</a></span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px">You must understand that I am not referring to Buddhism as a religion. I don't believe anything of no testable or experienceable consequence, and I do not prejudge anything. But, I try practicing meditation because of the great deal of pleasure i find out of it. To become scientifically inclined is not to just throw away all the religious hats but to rationally identify what is myth, what has testable consequences and what doesn't. In that sense I still am an atheist. But not an ignorant disbeliever, because I put everything into test <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/happy.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Happy :)" data-shortname=":)" /></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="djHiran, post: 12323972, member: 6429"] [COLOR="Sienna"][SIZE="4"]Proving Nibbana scientifically is not ever going to happen my friend! Nibbana is a personal experience. Think of it this way: When you see red color you cannot be sure if that's what someone else is seeing. If what he see is green according to your personal experience, he will still say what he see is red, because thats what he know as read! You fail to use your scientific apparatus to prove/disprove the existence of a red green discrepancy because you fail to find any physical law violated by hypothesizing the existence or non-existance of that condition. Even proving the existence of consciousness must be very hard if not impossible. You might say it is there because you experience it. But that won't "prove" it scientifically. Choosing Christianity or Islam if you had to merely for a 1 million dollars can very well be justified :yes:, and I take it as an expression of a personal preference. Firstly "believing in" Buddhism as a religion is not going to do any good for you. Secondly, yes Buddhism preach about something closely related to "sadness". If you translate "dhukka" into sadness it is just like saying "gandha" is "bad smell". Dhukka really contain both sadness and happiness in its core. However if you try to meditate in the intended way you will discover a great deal of pleasure out of it. You do not have to be or become a so called Buddhist to try out that. One of my Muslim friends once wanted to try "Jehana" and I told him how to. He expressed the same pleasure I experience after practicing it. Yet he is still a good Muslim. I admit that Jehana and other higher states of consciousness do not come to you for free as a consequence of adhering to Buddhism. That is but because it has absolutely nothing to do with your religion or religious beliefs! No need to say you cannot prove the existence of Jehana by scientific means, but only you can observe are the consequences of it. For example, a considerable shift in electric fields sourcing from brain is said to be observed. See for example : [url]http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/EEGmeditation.htm[/url] You must understand that I am not referring to Buddhism as a religion. I don't believe anything of no testable or experienceable consequence, and I do not prejudge anything. But, I try practicing meditation because of the great deal of pleasure i find out of it. To become scientifically inclined is not to just throw away all the religious hats but to rationally identify what is myth, what has testable consequences and what doesn't. In that sense I still am an atheist. But not an ignorant disbeliever, because I put everything into test :)[/SIZE][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Payakata winadi keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom