Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ela_eluwa120" data-source="post: 12325982" data-attributes="member: 193664">Labeling nibbana as a "personal experience" is not going to help. It can not be used as an evidence to prove Buddhism either. For one thing, one can use this same paragraph and replace the word "nibbana" with things like "union with Jesus", "knowing God", "union with God", "love of God", "Kaivalya" and so-on. Actually, one can argue that experiencing Santa Clause is a "personal experience", which can only be known by first person perspective, and there by conclude that Santa clause exists. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rolleyes.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Rolleyes    :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />Why use "personal experience arguments" only when it comes to Nibbana?Why not say like,  Is it because "union with Jesus" something that is not preached in your religion? Or is it because Christians are heathens (misadutuwo) as some Buddhist people believe?</blockquote>

Top Bottom