Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Wednesday at 11:58 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:23 PM
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Wednesday at 4:54 PM
Ad icon
🎮 INDIAN PSN GIFT CARDS AVAILABLE NOW! 🎮
madukaperera
Updated:
Tuesday at 12:57 PM
🚀 Google AI PRO – 18 Months | Rs. 850 Only
lkkolla
Updated:
Monday at 4:56 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Aethist corner of Elakiri
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="djHiran" data-source="post: 12326039" data-attributes="member: 6429"><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px">You got me wrong my friend, "proving Buddhism" is not my task <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rolleyes.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Rolleyes :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> What I have stated is just that Nibbana cannot be proven once and for all (But I am not using my inability as an argument to justify Buddhism). If you really want to, you can verify for yourself the existence of Jehana with a fairly little effort. But even that is not going to help you. Because Jehana is not something unique to Buddhism. Buddha's path starts right <em>after</em> you attain that state of consciousness. Jehana preexisted even before Buddha. But I can promise you Jehana really is a strong state of consciousness <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/yes.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":yes:" title="Yes :yes:" data-shortname=":yes:" /> You gotta experience it. It was a truly wonderful experience to me. I sometimes find myself using it as a helping tool for concentrating on difficult academic subjects <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /></span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px">You cannot prove Newton's second law by experimenting it. You only can verify it. Buddhism too is an experiment about yourself, in a sense. You can <em>verify</em> yourself the <em>validity <strong>or</strong> invalidity</em> of it if you really want to, but you may not be able to establish a proof (If you can establish, it will be a triumph <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/confused.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-shortname=":confused:" />). However, it is open to test.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px">I am NOT saying Buddhism is either the truth/has some degree of truth in it/is not the truth. But, if you are a believer or an active disbeliever you are wasting your time! Buddhism is not intended as a religion, at least as I see it (Remember : it is open to test). </span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><span style="font-size: 15px">Note however that I am not talking about "pop" Buddhism here.</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="djHiran, post: 12326039, member: 6429"] [COLOR="Sienna"][SIZE="4"]You got me wrong my friend, "proving Buddhism" is not my task :rolleyes: What I have stated is just that Nibbana cannot be proven once and for all (But I am not using my inability as an argument to justify Buddhism). If you really want to, you can verify for yourself the existence of Jehana with a fairly little effort. But even that is not going to help you. Because Jehana is not something unique to Buddhism. Buddha's path starts right [I]after[/I] you attain that state of consciousness. Jehana preexisted even before Buddha. But I can promise you Jehana really is a strong state of consciousness :yes: You gotta experience it. It was a truly wonderful experience to me. I sometimes find myself using it as a helping tool for concentrating on difficult academic subjects :D You cannot prove Newton's second law by experimenting it. You only can verify it. Buddhism too is an experiment about yourself, in a sense. You can [I]verify[/I] yourself the [I]validity [B]or[/B] invalidity[/I] of it if you really want to, but you may not be able to establish a proof (If you can establish, it will be a triumph :confused:). However, it is open to test. I am NOT saying Buddhism is either the truth/has some degree of truth in it/is not the truth. But, if you are a believer or an active disbeliever you are wasting your time! Buddhism is not intended as a religion, at least as I see it (Remember : it is open to test). Note however that I am not talking about "pop" Buddhism here.[/SIZE][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Haya warak paha keeyada? (haya wadi kireema paha)
Post reply
Top
Bottom