Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="daprinze" data-source="post: 17003783" data-attributes="member: 510932">Mate it is the 'theory' of evolution and not a 'fact' of evolution. There are many scientists who still do not agree with it . Besides hypothetically speaking that it is indeed a fact , how would you use it to explain the first living cell ? Evolution might explain the evolution of a species but how does it explain the origin of life ? Read "Not by Chance!: Shattering the Modern Theory of Evolution by Spetner, Lee M. .Humankind is indeed in the middle of a cosmic desert. Our world is a tiny dot when compared the size of the cosmos. Answer me this though , would you accept that if you found a watch in the middle of the desert you think it would have evolved into one ? And do you think that elements of nature combined by itself over a period of millenniums to form the complex human body made up of intricate chemical , biological and mechanical laws ? There are so many evidences of fine tuning in the universe. Life conducive constants such as level of oxygen , distance of earth from sun , tillt of the earth , mass of the universe and so much more that even if it were to differ by sometimes even .0000001 percent , life would not be possible. HAve you heard of the fibonacci sequence ? How can you explain the fact that something (the universe) came out of nothing ?Its easy branding these terms such as religious nuts , spaghetti monsters, blinded by faith here and there and paint a stereotypical picture but even if a madman says 2+2 is 4 you have to accept it !</blockquote>

Verification: Awruddata maasa keeyada?

Top Bottom