Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tom Riddle" data-source="post: 17004247" data-attributes="member: 47610">See this is why I don't debate religious nuts. You are so clueless and your knowledge of science is so bad that it hurts. The 'evolution is just a theory' argument is sooooo old and childish and so easily broken, you are just embarrassing yourself. In short, <img src="http://31.media.tumblr.com/e2059a0acbc7626174d156baab781fa0/tumblr_n9rej8xot31r7qpeho1_1280.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />Because 'theory' means something completely different in science when compared to what it means in day to day life. Kind of like 'weight' and 'mass'. Read this. <img src="http://user-cdn.spring.me/photos/20120722/n500cc53e6ef66.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />See what a 'theory' means in science? It's not even just a fact, it is an evidenced fact. There are other things that you accept, that are also 'just theories'. Like<img src="http://scienceprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/just_theories_591.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />So, I suggest you do this...<img src="http://media.tumblr.com/9b7c7a9f77d45d399e9f2177e6a97f07/tumblr_inline_mpbzwm6vtR1qz4rgp.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />Also, 1. Evolution does not attempt to explain the origin of life. Science does not have a definitive answer (as far as I know). That does not mean that your fairy tale is true.2. If I was in a desert, I would have no evidence to support either the claim of evolution of the watch or creation of the watch. Humankind does have evidence for evolution. That's why we accept it. 3. Read up on the anthropic principle if you want to understand how science explains the 'fine-tuning' of values of the universe.Peace out. Learn some science and then try to argue. </blockquote>

Verification: Hathara warak wissa keeyada? (Hathara wadi karanna 20)

Top Bottom