Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Salafist" data-source="post: 17441489" data-attributes="member: 518589">Not even Pascal's wager?Is that the way you spell atheist?Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Thus the default position to hold is agnosticism NOT atheism. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/happy.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Happy    :)" data-shortname=":)" />And fyi the argument used in the OP is highly circular. You claim that the burden of proof lies with the believers....and then ask us to prove God using the scientific method. Otherwise our claim is, by default, false.You don't need an Einstein to tell you that is circular reasoning. You CLAIM that a claim remains false unless proved by the scientific method. Now you are making a claim by simply stating this.Your claim is this: Claims are false unless proved by the scientific method.Now you have to prove your claim. And use the scientific method to prove this.In otherwords you've got to prove the scientific method using the scientific method. It's impossible. So argument is circular. FAIL.If you don't understand why mahinda maama can't contest for a further term legally, then you won't understand this post too. It needs brains and critical reasoning to understand.</blockquote>

Top Bottom