Any MATH experts here?

[humpty dumpty]

Hello, can anyone find answers for the above questions?

I received the below answers, not sure if it is correct, just need a verification. Please and thank you

 

[saja]

penne na ne , oka chatgpt upload kala nam iwry

 

[imhotep]

Your Matrix reduction seems to be correct. In any gaming matrix you get rid of the recessive row. The point to remember is that the matrix represents the payoffs for the row player and not the column player; therefore, the larger the number in the column, the smaller the payoff for the column player. So you discard the dominant column.

(BTW - I am no mathematician but know a few bits here & there)

 

[olu bakka]

Up

 

[humpty dumpty]

penne na ne , oka chatgpt upload kala nam iwry

Chatgpt isn’t accurate, thanks though.

---

Your Matrix reduction seems to be correct. In any gaming matrix you get rid of the recessive row. The point to remember is that the matrix represents the payoffs for the row player and not the column player; therefore, the larger the number in the column, the smaller the payoff for the column player. So you discard the dominant column.

(BTW - I am no mathematician but know a few bits here & there)

Thank you for the info; much appreciated.
------ Post added on Jan 20, 2025 at 6:50 AM

 

[07sanjeewakaru]

x1 = 1, x2 = 1/2 correct for original problem.
then,
ymin = 3/2

 

[humpty dumpty]

x1 = 1, x2 = 1/2 correct for original problem.
then,
ymin = 3/2

Thanks!