Latest ads

Ad icon
Wechat qr verification
- Pawan2005
- Updated: Today at 1:28 AM
🚀 GOOGLE AI PRO 18 MONTHS ACTIVATION 🚀
- sayuru bandara
- Updated: Yesterday at 5:34 PM
Pure VPN - Up to 27 Months
- vgp
- Updated: Friday at 8:10 AM
එක පැකේජ් එකයි මාසෙටම Unlimited Internet. තාමත් DATA CARD දාන්න සල්ලි වියදම් කරනවද? අඩුම මිලට අපෙන්.
- sayuru bandara
- Updated: Jun 2, 2026
Ad icon
ඉන්ටර්නෙට් එකෙන් හරියටම සල්ලි හොයන්න සහ Success වෙන්න කැමතිද? 🚀 (E-Money & Success Stories)
- siri sumana
- Updated: May 30, 2026

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="imhotep" data-source="post: 30485997" data-attributes="member: 562115"><p>Your Matrix reduction seems to be correct. In any gaming matrix you get rid of the recessive row. The point to remember is that the matrix represents the <strong>payoffs for the row player and not the column player; </strong>therefore, the larger the number in the column, the smaller the payoff for the column player. So you discard the dominant column.</p><p></p><p>(BTW -  I am no mathematician but know a few bits here & there)</p></blockquote><p></p>

Verification: Hathara warak wissa keeyada? (Hathara wadi karanna 20)

Top Bottom