Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:10 AM
Ad icon
QA Engineer Intern
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:07 AM
Ad icon
Sell your Land, House on idamata.lk for FREE
sajith.xp.pk
Updated:
Thursday at 9:03 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys
anil1961
Updated:
Jun 23, 2026
Bodim.lk out now !
Manoj Suranga Bandara
Updated:
Jun 21, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Tabloid
...BEAUTY N LOVE...
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="neroshan" data-source="post: 442676" data-attributes="member: 8568"><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><p style="text-align: center"><strong><span style="color: Blue">...BEAUTY N LOVE...</span></strong></p><p></span><strong><span style="color: Blue"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: Blue"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: Blue">Well, if the approach is only to know the connotation of these two words, then that would be no more than natural world, these are only the descents, but as I thinks, this only won't suit your mutual thoughts of philosophy. If a philosophical answer is what you are tentatively proposed to, (as I thinks because every person has got its own thinking, some people might be thinking about it just as the synonyms), so the description would of "love" be: It is permanent, and exists between only two permanent objects or living things.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: Blue">The sensation that exists between two humans isn't love. It can't be love and substantiate that one does not need any extra rationalistic thoughts. So here it draw closer. Love originally means permanent, and a characteristic and a feeling, which can subsist flanked by only two permanents. Two humans aren't permanents and can't be permanent towards each other. For a bit illustration: your soul can't love your body and neither you’re prolongation, why? Because a day will when your soul will leave its existence, and of coarse your corpse. So there can't be any love. There isn't any love between any mom and a child, why? Because one day will come when your mom or you will leave your mom ahead. So no love in that even.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: Blue">Listen I am not trying to say that there isn't any relation, the thing is only that we humans request, we be concerned, or a rapport of "cohort" can even transmit the name. But if still you'll use to word "love", then it would be nothing but irrational, and a bit more effective to your grammar skills.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: Blue">"Love” exists between only two i.e. the creator and the creation"</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: Blue">Beauty: it is the art of one's imaginations and can be of world too, in which you considers everything to be beautiful in its own way, if slight in a negative sense then dark beauty or black beauty, but it always sticks with beauty only.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: Blue"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: Blue">What is beauty and Love through you people?</span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="neroshan, post: 442676, member: 8568"] [SIZE="5"][CENTER][B][COLOR="Blue"]...BEAUTY N LOVE...[/COLOR][/B][/CENTER][B][COLOR="Blue"][/color][/b][/SIZE][B][COLOR="Blue"] Well, if the approach is only to know the connotation of these two words, then that would be no more than natural world, these are only the descents, but as I thinks, this only won't suit your mutual thoughts of philosophy. If a philosophical answer is what you are tentatively proposed to, (as I thinks because every person has got its own thinking, some people might be thinking about it just as the synonyms), so the description would of "love" be: It is permanent, and exists between only two permanent objects or living things. The sensation that exists between two humans isn't love. It can't be love and substantiate that one does not need any extra rationalistic thoughts. So here it draw closer. Love originally means permanent, and a characteristic and a feeling, which can subsist flanked by only two permanents. Two humans aren't permanents and can't be permanent towards each other. For a bit illustration: your soul can't love your body and neither you’re prolongation, why? Because a day will when your soul will leave its existence, and of coarse your corpse. So there can't be any love. There isn't any love between any mom and a child, why? Because one day will come when your mom or you will leave your mom ahead. So no love in that even. Listen I am not trying to say that there isn't any relation, the thing is only that we humans request, we be concerned, or a rapport of "cohort" can even transmit the name. But if still you'll use to word "love", then it would be nothing but irrational, and a bit more effective to your grammar skills. "Love” exists between only two i.e. the creator and the creation" Beauty: it is the art of one's imaginations and can be of world too, in which you considers everything to be beautiful in its own way, if slight in a negative sense then dark beauty or black beauty, but it always sticks with beauty only. What is beauty and Love through you people?[/COLOR][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom