Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
Iptv
musicking
Updated:
Yesterday at 9:52 AM
Ad icon
ZTE MF283U 4G Unlocked Router (Used)
ayanthamaxi
Updated:
Jul 19, 2026
ලංකාවේ හොඳම උපකාරක පන්ති සහ ගුරුවරුන් එකම තැනකින් - TopTuition.lk
dulithapathum
Updated:
Jul 18, 2026
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Big Bang Theory and Sinhala Buddhist explanation about Big Bang Theory
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tharinda07" data-source="post: 3660054" data-attributes="member: 21844"><p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size: 15px"><u><span style="color: Blue"><strong>Anthropic principle</strong></span></u></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size: 15px"><u></u></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: SeaGreen">One solution to the problem is to invoke the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle" target="_blank">anthropic principle</a>, which states that humans should take into account the conditions necessary for them to exist when speculating about causes of the universe's properties. If two types of universe seem equally likely but only one is suitable for the evolution of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_life" target="_blank">intelligent life</a>, the anthropic principle suggests that finding ourselves in that universe is no surprise: if the other universe had existed instead, there would be no observers to notice the fact.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: SeaGreen">The principle can be applied to solve the flatness problem in two somewhat different ways. The first (an application of the 'strong anthropic principle') was suggested by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._B._Collins" target="_blank">C. B. Collins</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking" target="_blank">Stephen Hawking</a>,<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem#cite_note-Collins_Hawking-8" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem#cite_note-Collins_Hawking-8</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem#cite_note-Anthropic_Explanations-9" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem#cite_note-Anthropic_Explanations-9</a> who in 1973 considered the existence of an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_universes" target="_blank">infinite number of universes</a> such that every possible combination of initial properties was held by some universe. In such a situation, they argued, only those universes with exactly the correct density for forming galaxies and stars would give rise to intelligent observers such as humans: therefore, the fact that we observe Ω<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem#cite_note-Collins_Hawking-8" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem#cite_note-Collins_Hawking-8</a> to be so close to 1 would be "simply a reflection of our own existence."</span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: SeaGreen">An alternative approach, which makes use of the 'weak anthropic principle', is to suppose that the universe is infinite in size, but with the density varying in different places (i.e. an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homogeneity_%28physics%29" target="_blank">inhomogeneous</a> universe). Thus some regions will be over-dense (Ω > 1) and some under-dense (Ω < 1). These regions may be extremely far apart - perhaps so far that light has not had time to travel from one to another during the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe" target="_blank">age of the universe</a> (that is, they lie outside one another's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_horizon" target="_blank">cosmological horizons</a>). Therefore each such region would behave essentially as a separate universe: if we happened to live in a large patch of almost-critical density we would have no way of knowing of the existence of far-off under- or over-dense patches since no light or other signal has reached us from them. An appeal to the anthropic principle can then be made, arguing that intelligent life would only arise in those patches with Ω<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem#cite_note-10" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem#cite_note-10</a> very close to 1, and that therefore our living in such a patch is unsurprising.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: SeaGreen">This latter argument makes use of a version of the anthropic principle which is 'weaker' in the sense that it requires no speculation on multiple universes, or on the probabilities of various different universes existing instead of the current one. It requires only a single universe which is infinite - or merely large enough that many disconnected patches can form - and that the density varies in different regions (which is certainly the case on smaller scales, giving rise to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_cluster" target="_blank">galactic clusters</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Void_%28astronomy%29" target="_blank">voids</a>).</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tharinda07, post: 3660054, member: 21844"] [CENTER][SIZE=4][U][COLOR=Blue][B]Anthropic principle[/B][/COLOR] [/U][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][COLOR=SeaGreen]One solution to the problem is to invoke the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle"]anthropic principle[/URL], which states that humans should take into account the conditions necessary for them to exist when speculating about causes of the universe's properties. If two types of universe seem equally likely but only one is suitable for the evolution of [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_life"]intelligent life[/URL], the anthropic principle suggests that finding ourselves in that universe is no surprise: if the other universe had existed instead, there would be no observers to notice the fact.[/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][COLOR=SeaGreen]The principle can be applied to solve the flatness problem in two somewhat different ways. The first (an application of the 'strong anthropic principle') was suggested by [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._B._Collins"]C. B. Collins[/URL] and [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking"]Stephen Hawking[/URL],[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem#cite_note-Collins_Hawking-8"][/URL][URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem#cite_note-Anthropic_Explanations-9"][/URL] who in 1973 considered the existence of an [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_universes"]infinite number of universes[/URL] such that every possible combination of initial properties was held by some universe. In such a situation, they argued, only those universes with exactly the correct density for forming galaxies and stars would give rise to intelligent observers such as humans: therefore, the fact that we observe Ω[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem#cite_note-Collins_Hawking-8"][/URL] to be so close to 1 would be "simply a reflection of our own existence."[/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][COLOR=SeaGreen]An alternative approach, which makes use of the 'weak anthropic principle', is to suppose that the universe is infinite in size, but with the density varying in different places (i.e. an [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homogeneity_%28physics%29"]inhomogeneous[/URL] universe). Thus some regions will be over-dense (Ω > 1) and some under-dense (Ω < 1). These regions may be extremely far apart - perhaps so far that light has not had time to travel from one to another during the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe"]age of the universe[/URL] (that is, they lie outside one another's [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_horizon"]cosmological horizons[/URL]). Therefore each such region would behave essentially as a separate universe: if we happened to live in a large patch of almost-critical density we would have no way of knowing of the existence of far-off under- or over-dense patches since no light or other signal has reached us from them. An appeal to the anthropic principle can then be made, arguing that intelligent life would only arise in those patches with Ω[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem#cite_note-10"][/URL] very close to 1, and that therefore our living in such a patch is unsurprising.[/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][COLOR=SeaGreen]This latter argument makes use of a version of the anthropic principle which is 'weaker' in the sense that it requires no speculation on multiple universes, or on the probabilities of various different universes existing instead of the current one. It requires only a single universe which is infinite - or merely large enough that many disconnected patches can form - and that the density varies in different regions (which is certainly the case on smaller scales, giving rise to [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_cluster"]galactic clusters[/URL] and [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Void_%28astronomy%29"]voids[/URL]).[/COLOR][/SIZE][/CENTER] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom