Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hafizsaad" data-source="post: 5942547" data-attributes="member: 153303">Well big bang wasn't an explosion in the strict sense of the word, but the word explosion is still somewhat applicable. Your argument is semantic in nature; splitting hairs.As for your argument on entropy the link is accessible to members of that site only. Anyway, granted  if space expands infinity swapping entropy into empty space might postphone a "maximum" entropy-value infinity as well. But it still doesn't decrease entropy. So my argument still stands in the sense that the idea of an infinitely old universe does not correspond to observance of our current universe.  If I was simplistic in my explanation, that was to make it accessible to the general public as there is no real reason to go into those details.Brother Mononoke,The All Material which i have given is my Friend great search on the topic, He is a Philospher and a good scientist and also former athiest...he was a big athiest debator till 2005. after world when he convert he has written all answer to confusion of athiest on all critical topic (dont mind i am using world confusion)...the upper comment i posted is also directly from him. As for your comment on my understanding of time and infinity, I (My friend) can't really respond to that since you didn't care to back up your claims with arguments.Brother i am giving you his website :<a href="http://seemyparadigm.webs.com/" target="_blank">http://seemyparadigm.webs.com/</a>he has discuss infinity on the "fundamentalism" page of his website see <a href="http://seemyparadigm.webs.com/fundamentalism.htm" target="_blank">here</a>and discuss the nature and ontology of time on the "four-dimensionalism-page see <a href="http://seemyparadigm.webs.com/fourdimensionalism.htm" target="_blank">here</a>I think this site will be helpfull for you on all topic..</blockquote>

Verification: Haya warak paha keeyada? (haya wadi kireema paha)

Top Bottom

Search

Latest ads

Reply to thread