Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="deanXX" data-source="post: 16753061" data-attributes="member: 492830"><img src="http://o.aolcdn.com/hss/storage/midas/52bbc959db40cec111f36041d4552476/200245090/0194623393.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />The format war. Over the last few decades it has played out across various forms of tech -- AC vs DC, VHS vs. Beta -- usually with fierce battle lines drawn and millions or even billions of dollars at stake. Recently, none have burned so brightly as the battle of HD DVD vs. Blu-ray (read our blow-by-blow retrospective of the 2005 - 2007 battle here). And it brought all the classic elements: Sides were divided between titans of the industry, led by Sony pressing the Blu-ray side and Toshiba backing HD DVD, with the PS3 and Xbox 360 ready to serve with as trojan horses. As if the the stakes weren't high enough already, the specter of an oncoming internet streaming winter loomed like Game of Throne's army of White Walkers. So what really happened, who won in the end and most importantly, was that victory actually worth it all?Looking back to 2005, HDTVs were finally available everywhere, but not everyone had one yet. A study by Leichtman Research Group would put the adoption rate at about 12 percent by the end of the year, and Nintendo even declined to make an HD-ready version of its new game system, the Wii. It was nearly impossible to buy movies in high definition, with cable or satellite broadcasts left as the only easy option. DVD player-based upscaling promised to make movies look better on HDTVs, but couldn't quite compare with the resolution of the real thing. There was a light on the horizon, however: Sony and Microsoft were both ready to place calculated bets on the "HD Era" of gaming, and the PS3 would even arrive with a Blu-ray player built-in. Microsoft stuck with plain DVDs, but promised an HD DVD add-on for the future.The consoles' arrival turned out to to be particularly welcome too. The first dedicated players to ship were crudely designed, made from left-over laptop parts, slow, glitchy and retailed for around $500 (HD DVD) or $1,000 (Blu-ray). At the time, concerns over DRM like the "Image Constraint Token" that could block HD playback on TVs without copyright protected HDMI jacks ruled the day and we weren't sure 50GB Blu-ray discs would actually appear -- neither issue amounted to much. In time, the players got better and cheaper, and after a while, it was actually normal to see new movies released on HD formats alongside DVDs. In the end, Sony's Blu-ray format eventually prevailed and is still going strong as we speak. But the path to that victory was a costly one for Sony.<img src="http://o.aolcdn.com/hss/storage/midas/fa912bbc671cf26f6510b7d2e830b62e/200245047/Toshiba-HD-XA1.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2014/06/07/format-wars-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd/?ncid=rss_truncated&utm_campaign=socialmedia_fb&utm_source=socialmedia_fb&utm_medium=fb" target="_blank">more</a></blockquote>

Verification: Hathara warak wissa keeyada? (Hathara wadi karanna 20)

Top Bottom