Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="greenthunder" data-source="post: 24391293" data-attributes="member: 297213">That is a broad generalization. Buddhist literature attracted Vedic and Brahmanic mysticism after Buddhas parinirvana. What you claimed is not recorded in Suttas but a book called Thupavamsa, or maybe its Mahavamsa, I too am not sure. But I know its not recorded in Pali canon.Its the general consensus among Buddhist (scholars and others alike) that Theravada Tripitaka is the least adulterated collection of what Buddha preached. So if you are interested in legitimacy of Buddha or his teaching why not actually read HIS teaching? And figure it out by yourself.If you are interested in that I could give some pointers but I sense you are not interested in that are you...If I am wrong say so and I will put forth my terms of engagement.</blockquote>

Top Bottom