Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nash_Node" data-source="post: 1998816" data-attributes="member: 91200">WELL WHY NOT USE THE NAMES ??After all, if it's good for anyone to use the name to say anything, why not I say and especially when the FACT is true.I am protected by the "freedom of speech" law (you can challenge it if you want with me, but I would hardly guess you will win<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/lol.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="LOL    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" />)But, in real sense, YES, I CAN USE THE NAMEsince it's TRUE and if anyone challenges, they can refer to the case which was heard in court number 2 of the lower courts (colombo) ....... I will refrain from putting out the exact date.as for your question,yes, the guys were charged with sexually molesting minors, since all the guys were over 18. And the girls were handed over to the parents care to take any decission the parents want to, with an option of court ruling that they would be sent to a "rehabilitation project" if the parents rufuce the acceptence of their child.All girls were accepted by their parents (but don't know what happened to them afterwards)and NO, I was not practicing, I was "just" happen to be there to meet a fellow senior lawyer of mine and just "went" to court 2 hearing that "THIS" case is being heard <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rolleyes.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Rolleyes    :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rolleyes.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Rolleyes    :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></blockquote>

Verification: Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)

Top Bottom