Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Pure VPN - Up to 27 Months
vgp
Updated:
Yesterday at 8:10 AM
එක පැකේජ් එකයි මාසෙටම Unlimited Internet. තාමත් DATA CARD දාන්න සල්ලි වියදම් කරනවද? අඩුම මිලට අපෙන්.
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Tuesday at 12:30 PM
Ad icon
ඉන්ටර්නෙට් එකෙන් හරියටම සල්ලි හොයන්න සහ Success වෙන්න කැමතිද? 🚀 (E-Money & Success Stories)
siri sumana
Updated:
May 30, 2026
Gemini AI PRO 18 months Offer
Hawaka
Updated:
May 27, 2026
Ad icon
koko account
DasunEranga
Updated:
May 27, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
CONSTRUCTIVE RELATIVISM
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tharinda07" data-source="post: 3233538" data-attributes="member: 21844"><p><span style="color: Blue">CONSTRUCTIVE RELATIVISM</span></p><p><span style="color: Blue"></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Black"><strong>In this paper a new philosophical approach is presented, that could be termed "paticasamuppadin", that is different from the conventional materialistic and idealistic approaches. The materialists starting with the Greeks in the west, and the Dravyavadins in Bharat, in general attempted to reduce all phenomena to a materialist base. The Buddhist idealists in the form of Vinnavadins and the Greek idealists on the other hand wanted to show that the mind is supreme, and that the so called material world was the creation of the mind. We present a different approach, where the world as an observer "sees" is created by the observer due to "avidya" of anicca, dukka and anatta which could be "roughly translated" as ignorance of impermanence and soullessness. The "world" is anicca, dukka, anatma and sunya. However anicca and anatta are not concepts, and as such it is futile to attempt to translate them into English or any other language. Even in Pali they should be considered as non concepts that defy explanation using concepts or other words. Also unlike in Madhyamikavada sunya is not elevated to a concept with sunyata coming into the picture as a noun. We argue that the world is nothing but the creation of the observer, and the world is same as the knowledge of the world. In the present approach it is not assumed that a world exits independent of the observer who attempts to know or gather "information" of an already existing world. The observer creates knowledge of the world, and hence the world, relative to the sense organs, mind and the culture of the observer. The knowledge is thus created by the mind with the aid of the other sense organs. There is no knowledge or world, before such knowledge of the world is created, and the knowledge is created as concepts theories etc., by the observer. Thus the so called world is the conceptual and theoretical world of the observer that has been created in the mind. It should be noted that the concepts need not be in the form of words, as images formed in the mind are also considered as concepts. However, according to the approach presented in the paper the mind is not an absolute that has an independent existence. A "model" is created in which the mind of an observer is also created by the mind itself! The mind is presented as a stream of "cittas" which themselves are the concepts that could be supposed to exist in the smallest duration that can be created (grasped) by the mind. The logic of the present approach is cyclic and fourfold, and not Aristotelian.</strong></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Black"><strong></strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: Blue">Nalin de Silva.</span></p><p><span style="color: Blue">Department of Mathematics,</span></p><p><span style="color: Blue">University of Kelaniya,</span></p><p><span style="color: Blue">Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. </span></p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.fileden.com/files/2006/5/24/35388/13JLMCE600x575.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p>by rapa</p><p></p><p>also check dis link <a href="http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=114856" target="_blank">http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=114856</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tharinda07, post: 3233538, member: 21844"] [COLOR="Blue"]CONSTRUCTIVE RELATIVISM [/COLOR] [SIZE="4"][COLOR="Black"][B]In this paper a new philosophical approach is presented, that could be termed "paticasamuppadin", that is different from the conventional materialistic and idealistic approaches. The materialists starting with the Greeks in the west, and the Dravyavadins in Bharat, in general attempted to reduce all phenomena to a materialist base. The Buddhist idealists in the form of Vinnavadins and the Greek idealists on the other hand wanted to show that the mind is supreme, and that the so called material world was the creation of the mind. We present a different approach, where the world as an observer "sees" is created by the observer due to "avidya" of anicca, dukka and anatta which could be "roughly translated" as ignorance of impermanence and soullessness. The "world" is anicca, dukka, anatma and sunya. However anicca and anatta are not concepts, and as such it is futile to attempt to translate them into English or any other language. Even in Pali they should be considered as non concepts that defy explanation using concepts or other words. Also unlike in Madhyamikavada sunya is not elevated to a concept with sunyata coming into the picture as a noun. We argue that the world is nothing but the creation of the observer, and the world is same as the knowledge of the world. In the present approach it is not assumed that a world exits independent of the observer who attempts to know or gather "information" of an already existing world. The observer creates knowledge of the world, and hence the world, relative to the sense organs, mind and the culture of the observer. The knowledge is thus created by the mind with the aid of the other sense organs. There is no knowledge or world, before such knowledge of the world is created, and the knowledge is created as concepts theories etc., by the observer. Thus the so called world is the conceptual and theoretical world of the observer that has been created in the mind. It should be noted that the concepts need not be in the form of words, as images formed in the mind are also considered as concepts. However, according to the approach presented in the paper the mind is not an absolute that has an independent existence. A "model" is created in which the mind of an observer is also created by the mind itself! The mind is presented as a stream of "cittas" which themselves are the concepts that could be supposed to exist in the smallest duration that can be created (grasped) by the mind. The logic of the present approach is cyclic and fourfold, and not Aristotelian. [/B][/COLOR][/SIZE] [COLOR="Blue"]Nalin de Silva. Department of Mathematics, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. [/COLOR] [IMG]http://www.fileden.com/files/2006/5/24/35388/13JLMCE600x575.jpg[/IMG] by rapa also check dis link [URL="http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=114856"]http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=114856[/URL][COLOR="Blue"][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)
Post reply
Top
Bottom