Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
ඔයාගෙ Assignment හෝ Thesis එක හරියට හදාගමු
ErMurazor
Updated:
Saturday at 10:52 PM
Ad icon
BlackWall V2ray servers
hu KANNA
Updated:
Wednesday at 4:58 AM
Peppa Pig Family Plush Toy Set – 5 Characters
anil1961
Updated:
Sep 19, 2026
Ad icon
Express VPN PC - 1 Year Rs. 600.00
Sanathbh
Updated:
Sep 19, 2026
Ad icon
Capcut Pro 7 Days Team Plan - Rs. 3️⃣0️⃣0️⃣
Sanathbh
Updated:
Sep 19, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
CONSTRUCTIVE RELATIVISM
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sanfOdian" data-source="post: 3241821" data-attributes="member: 135326"><p><strong>I can grasp part of what you are asserting, and what I can grasp hardly seems original or different from any number of idealist approaches. First,though, can you tell me who "We" is? You use "we" in your post, but don't identify this collective entity.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Also this: "The "world" is anicca, dukka, anatma and sunya. However anicca and anatta are not concepts, and as such it is futile to attempt to translate them into English or any other language. Even in Pali they should be considered as non concepts that defy explanation using concepts or other words."</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>So you are telling us that there is something very important that is not a concept and that you cannot explain or even name. What is the point then? How can anyone decide whether they agree or disgree with your thesis if you do not tell them what it is. I suggest you develop some communicable concepts and then thave another go at communicating your ideas.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sanfOdian, post: 3241821, member: 135326"] [B]I can grasp part of what you are asserting, and what I can grasp hardly seems original or different from any number of idealist approaches. First,though, can you tell me who "We" is? You use "we" in your post, but don't identify this collective entity. Also this: "The "world" is anicca, dukka, anatma and sunya. However anicca and anatta are not concepts, and as such it is futile to attempt to translate them into English or any other language. Even in Pali they should be considered as non concepts that defy explanation using concepts or other words." So you are telling us that there is something very important that is not a concept and that you cannot explain or even name. What is the point then? How can anyone decide whether they agree or disgree with your thesis if you do not tell them what it is. I suggest you develop some communicable concepts and then thave another go at communicating your ideas.[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom