Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
ලංකාවේ හොඳම උපකාරක පන්ති සහ ගුරුවරුන් එකම තැනකින් - TopTuition.lk
dulithapathum
Updated:
Yesterday at 8:07 AM
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Wednesday at 11:58 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:23 PM
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Wednesday at 4:54 PM
Ad icon
🎮 INDIAN PSN GIFT CARDS AVAILABLE NOW! 🎮
madukaperera
Updated:
Tuesday at 12:57 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Danushka Gunathilaka cleared of Tinder date rape
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mag123" data-source="post: 29235523" data-attributes="member: 73975"><p>Sri Lankan international cricketer Danushka Gunathilaka has been found not guilty of sexual assault by a Sydney judge who said the evidence established there was “no opportunity” for him to have removed a condom during sex, and that he was truthful in his police interview.</p><p>The 32-year-old batsman was accused of “stealthing” during sex with a 29-year-old woman without her knowledge in her eastern suburbs home on November 2, 2022. He pleaded not guilty to sexual intercourse without consent and faced a four-day trial before Judge Sarah Huggett in Downing Centre District Court</p><hr /><p>Huggett found that the alleged victim, who cannot be legally named, was an intelligent witness who did not deliberately give false evidence but was motivated by a desire to paint the cricketer in an unfavourable light.</p><p></p><p>"I find that the evidence regarding the complaint far from supports the complainant. Rather it undermines the reliability of her evidence," she said.</p><p>------ <span style="font-size: 10px">Post added on [DATETIME="UT"]1695868304[/DATETIME]</span></p><hr /><p>During the judge-alone trial, defence lawyers attacked the credibility of the complainant, claiming her story shifted over time and that she edited her version of events to paint Gunathilaka as an aggressive person.</p><p></p><p>Huggett also heard evidence from two of the woman's friends who described her as fragile and distraught the day after the cricketer attended her home</p><p>------ <span style="font-size: 10px">Post added on [DATETIME="UT"]1695868402[/DATETIME]</span></p><hr /><p>[ATTACH=full]215495[/ATTACH]</p><p>------ <span style="font-size: 10px">Post added on [DATETIME="UT"]1695868454[/DATETIME]</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mag123, post: 29235523, member: 73975"] Sri Lankan international cricketer Danushka Gunathilaka has been found not guilty of sexual assault by a Sydney judge who said the evidence established there was “no opportunity” for him to have removed a condom during sex, and that he was truthful in his police interview. The 32-year-old batsman was accused of “stealthing” during sex with a 29-year-old woman without her knowledge in her eastern suburbs home on November 2, 2022. He pleaded not guilty to sexual intercourse without consent and faced a four-day trial before Judge Sarah Huggett in Downing Centre District Court [HR][/HR] Huggett found that the alleged victim, who cannot be legally named, was an intelligent witness who did not deliberately give false evidence but was motivated by a desire to paint the cricketer in an unfavourable light. "I find that the evidence regarding the complaint far from supports the complainant. Rather it undermines the reliability of her evidence," she said. ------ [SIZE=2]Post added on [DATETIME="UT"]1695868304[/DATETIME][/SIZE] [HR][/HR] During the judge-alone trial, defence lawyers attacked the credibility of the complainant, claiming her story shifted over time and that she edited her version of events to paint Gunathilaka as an aggressive person. Huggett also heard evidence from two of the woman's friends who described her as fragile and distraught the day after the cricketer attended her home ------ [SIZE=2]Post added on [DATETIME="UT"]1695868402[/DATETIME][/SIZE] [HR][/HR] [ATTACH type="full"]215495[/ATTACH] ------ [SIZE=2]Post added on [DATETIME="UT"]1695868454[/DATETIME][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hathara warak wissa keeyada? (Hathara wadi karanna 20)
Post reply
Top
Bottom