Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="rapa" data-source="post: 495208" data-attributes="member: 212">"MCC’s Laws Sub-Committee has issued a statement in which it concludes that “the incident could not be classed either as contravening the Law or as breaching the Spirit of the Game.”The debate gone all over the internet to office trains now has to come to an end. There was a questionable grey areas in Gilly's act, so no one could possibly say Sri Lankans are "sore losers", for raising this issue. Now, that the "Guardians of the Laws of Cricket" saying that Adam Gilchrist haven't done anything wrong, we have to admit that."In this case (Adam Gilchrist in the ICC Cricket World Cup Final), apparently the addendum to the inside of the batting gloves was not for protection from injury, but to improve the way the batsman gripped the bat handle. This should not be considered unfair. Similarly, it has never been considered unfair for batsmen to use two grips on the bat handle." <a href="http://www.lords.org/latest-news/news-archive/mcc-gilchrist-did-not-contravene-the-law-or-spirit-of-cricket,850,NS.html" target="_blank">http://www.lords.org/latest-news/news-archive/mcc-gilchrist-did-not-contravene-the-law-or-spirit-of-cricket,850,NS.html</a></blockquote>

Top Bottom